Generative AI as a Cognitive Bridging Partner: Applying Adaption–Innovation Theory to Human–AI Collaboration

As organizations increasingly integrate generative artificial intelligence (AI) into leadership, education, coaching, and knowledge work, an important question emerges: How might AI interact with or facilitate cognitive style diversity? Kirton’s (2003) Adaption–Innovation (A–I) theory provides a rigorous framework for understanding differences in problem-solving style, structure preference, cognitive gap, and coping behavior (Fridel, 2023). While AI tools are rapidly entering the workplace, they are rarely examined through the lens of cognitive style (Jablokow, 2026). This roundtable proposes that generative AI can be explored not merely as a productivity tool, but as a structured thought partner that may: support Problem A (task resolution), Influence Problem B (managing cognitive diversity), serve as a potential cognitive bridger, and/or affect coping load across wide KAI gaps. The session aligns directly with the 2026 Symposium theme, KAI at 50: Shaping the Future of Work and Wellbeing, by examining how A–I theory can guide responsible and style-aware AI integration in leadership and teamwork contexts. Rather than positioning AI as a replacement for human cognition, this roundtable situates A–I theory as an interpretive framework for understanding and shaping human–AI collaboration.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
Published
2026-04-14
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI as a Cognitive Bridging Partner: Applying Adaption–Innovation Theory to Human–AI Collaboration

Eric K. Kaufman
VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Generative AI as a Cognitive Bridging Partner: Applying Adaption–Innovation Theory to Human–AI Collaboration

Eric K. Kaufman
article en

Abstract

As organizations increasingly integrate generative artificial intelligence (AI) into leadership, education, coaching, and knowledge work, an important question emerges: How might AI interact with or facilitate cognitive style diversity? Kirton’s (2003) Adaption–Innovation (A–I) theory provides a rigorous framework for understanding differences in problem-solving style, structure preference, cognitive gap, and coping behavior (Fridel, 2023). While AI tools are rapidly entering the workplace, they are rarely examined through the lens of cognitive style (Jablokow, 2026). This roundtable proposes that generative AI can be explored not merely as a productivity tool, but as a structured thought partner that may: support Problem A (task resolution), Influence Problem B (managing cognitive diversity), serve as a potential cognitive bridger, and/or affect coping load across wide KAI gaps. The session aligns directly with the 2026 Symposium theme, KAI at 50: Shaping the Future of Work and Wellbeing, by examining how A–I theory can guide responsible and style-aware AI integration in leadership and teamwork contexts. Rather than positioning AI as a replacement for human cognition, this roundtable situates A–I theory as an interpretive framework for understanding and shaping human–AI collaboration.

VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.