A Study of Innate Human Disposition in Quran and Bible, from the Perspective of Gordon D. Nickel's book 'The Quran with Christian Commentary'

Abstract This paper examines the divergent perspectives of Islam and mainstream Christianity regarding human nature and the doctrine of sin. In Islamic thought, every human being is created upon fitrah (a pure and natural disposition) and thus enters the world free from sin. However, under the influence of environment, the lower self (nafs), and Satan, individuals may transgress, for which the Qur’an prescribes repentance and righteous deeds as the path to forgiveness. By contrast, mainstream Christianity posits that humanity is inherently sinful from birth, and that redemption from this condition required the atoning sacrifice of Jesus on the cross. Nonetheless, the Bible also reflects another viewpoint—closely aligned with the Islamic conception—where sins are forgiven through repentance and good works. Gordon D. Nickel, however, argues in his book “The Quran with Christian commentary” that both the Qur’an and the Bible affirm the inherent sinfulness of human beings, presenting various supporting arguments. This paper contends that such a conclusion is inaccurate, as both scriptures contain significant teachings that challenge and, in fact, contradict the claim of innate human sinfulness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open MIND
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19652676
Primary Topic
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study of Innate Human Disposition in Quran and Bible, from the Perspective of Gordon D. Nickel's book 'The Quran with Christian Commentary'

Ihsanullah, Dr. Muhammad Tariq, Zakir ullah
Open MIND
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
article

A Study of Innate Human Disposition in Quran and Bible, from the Perspective of Gordon D. Nickel's book 'The Quran with Christian Commentary'

Ihsanullah, Dr. Muhammad Tariq, Zakir ullah
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the divergent perspectives of Islam and mainstream Christianity regarding human nature and the doctrine of sin. In Islamic thought, every human being is created upon fitrah (a pure and natural disposition) and thus enters the world free from sin. However, under the influence of environment, the lower self (nafs), and Satan, individuals may transgress, for which the Qur’an prescribes repentance and righteous deeds as the path to forgiveness. By contrast, mainstream Christianity posits that humanity is inherently sinful from birth, and that redemption from this condition required the atoning sacrifice of Jesus on the cross. Nonetheless, the Bible also reflects another viewpoint—closely aligned with the Islamic conception—where sins are forgiven through repentance and good works. Gordon D. Nickel, however, argues in his book “The Quran with Christian commentary” that both the Qur’an and the Bible affirm the inherent sinfulness of human beings, presenting various supporting arguments. This paper contends that such a conclusion is inaccurate, as both scriptures contain significant teachings that challenge and, in fact, contradict the claim of innate human sinfulness.

Open MIND
Riphah International University (PK), University of Malakand (PK)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.