AI and VUCA Are Here to Stay

Drawing on recent conceptual and empirical work on metamodern education, Higher Education 4.0, and transdisciplinary AI-interoperable competencies, alongside European Commission and UNESCO policy frameworks, this food-for-thought article adopts an integrative approach that synthesises research evidence, policy analysis, and practice-based insights for business education leadership and management. As AI and persistent social crises and VUCA/BANI conditions have become structural features of contemporary organisational and educational life, business schools are now at the centre of intersecting technological, geopolitical, and societal disruptions. Against this backdrop, this article addresses a central question for higher education: what should business schools teach (and, more importantly, how) when uncertainty, crisis, and AI-mediated decision-making are no longer exceptional but systemic. The analysis demonstrates that traditional discipline-centred and tool-oriented pedagogies are, while still foundational, increasingly strained by the realities graduates face in AI-mediated and crisis-shaped environments and are no longer adequate on their own. Instead, effective business education requires a shift toward cultivating navigational capacities, including systems thinking, intercultural competence, ethical judgment, emotional resilience, and context-aware AI literacy. The article further argues that evolutionary pedagogies (such as case-based learning, simulations, project work under uncertainty, and reflective practice) are particularly effective in developing these capacities. It concludes that business schools can no longer define their mission primarily in terms of knowledge transmission or skills optimisation. Instead, they are called to assume a renewed social contract: preparing leaders capable of responsible action, ethical sensemaking, and sustained agency in AI-mediated, crisis-shaped environments, with significant implications for curriculum design, faculty roles, and higher education policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GiLE Journal of Skills Development
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52398/gjsd.2026.v6.i1.pp198-206
Primary Topic
Educational Leadership and Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI and VUCA Are Here to Stay

Yuliya Shtaltovna
GiLE Journal of Skills Development
Educational Leadership and Innovation
article

AI and VUCA Are Here to Stay

Yuliya Shtaltovna
article en

Abstract

Drawing on recent conceptual and empirical work on metamodern education, Higher Education 4.0, and transdisciplinary AI-interoperable competencies, alongside European Commission and UNESCO policy frameworks, this food-for-thought article adopts an integrative approach that synthesises research evidence, policy analysis, and practice-based insights for business education leadership and management. As AI and persistent social crises and VUCA/BANI conditions have become structural features of contemporary organisational and educational life, business schools are now at the centre of intersecting technological, geopolitical, and societal disruptions. Against this backdrop, this article addresses a central question for higher education: what should business schools teach (and, more importantly, how) when uncertainty, crisis, and AI-mediated decision-making are no longer exceptional but systemic. The analysis demonstrates that traditional discipline-centred and tool-oriented pedagogies are, while still foundational, increasingly strained by the realities graduates face in AI-mediated and crisis-shaped environments and are no longer adequate on their own. Instead, effective business education requires a shift toward cultivating navigational capacities, including systems thinking, intercultural competence, ethical judgment, emotional resilience, and context-aware AI literacy. The article further argues that evolutionary pedagogies (such as case-based learning, simulations, project work under uncertainty, and reflective practice) are particularly effective in developing these capacities. It concludes that business schools can no longer define their mission primarily in terms of knowledge transmission or skills optimisation. Instead, they are called to assume a renewed social contract: preparing leaders capable of responsible action, ethical sensemaking, and sustained agency in AI-mediated, crisis-shaped environments, with significant implications for curriculum design, faculty roles, and higher education policy.

GiLE Journal of Skills DevelopmentVol. 6(1)
Hochschule Fresenius (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Educational Leadership and Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.