Trends in primary surgery and overall survival in non-metastatic anal cancer: a population-based analysis

BACKGROUND: Anal cancer incidence is rising in the United States, now exceeding 10 000 cases annually. Chemoradiation (CRT) is the standard curative-intent treatment for non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA), with surgery generally reserved for non-responders with persistent or progressive disease. Recent trials have refined management, supporting the assessment of response at 26 weeks before considering surgery. However, contemporary population-level patterns of upfront primary surgery and associated survival trends remain incompletely described. METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry (2004-2020), we identified adults with newly diagnosed non-metastatic anal squamous cell neoplasms (ICD-O-3 8050-8089). Outcomes were receipt of primary surgery as initial treatment and overall survival. We evaluated temporal trends (Cochran-Armitage), factors associated with primary surgery (multivariable logistic regression), and survival over time (Kaplan-Meier; multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling). RESULTS: Among 16 718 patients with non-metastatic anal cancer, 33.1% (n = 5529) underwent primary surgery and 83.7% (n = 13 997) received radiation as part of initial management. Primary surgery declined from 46.0% in 2004 to 28.7% in 2020 (trend P < 0.001), while radiation utilization was relatively stable over time (trend P = 0.106). In adjusted analyses, younger age (<50 vs 60-69 years; OR 1.614), male sex (OR 1.508), and Non-Hispanic Black race (vs Non-Hispanic White; OR 1.178) were associated with higher odds of primary surgery. Tumor factors were strongly associated with surgical use (eg, T1 vs T2: OR 3.072; higher N stage associated with lower odds). Overall survival improved across diagnosis periods (log-rank P = 0.0002); in adjusted Cox models, diagnosis in 2016-2020 (vs 2004-2007) was associated with lower mortality risk (HR 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: From 2004 to 2020, primary surgery as initial management for non-metastatic anal cancer declined substantially, consistent with increasing adoption of CRT, while overall survival improved over time. Persistent use of upfront surgery in select subgroups warrants further study to clarify indications and ensure guideline-concordant care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Oncologist
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyag148
Primary Topic
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trends in primary surgery and overall survival in non-metastatic anal cancer: a population-based analysis

Madison Conces, Cathy Eng, Natalie A. Lockney, Chan Shen et al.
The Oncologist
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
article

Trends in primary surgery and overall survival in non-metastatic anal cancer: a population-based analysis

Madison Conces, Cathy Eng, Natalie A. Lockney, Chan Shen, Joshua E. Meyer, Jennifer G. Whisenant, Al B. Benson, Timothy M. Geiger, Jennifer Dorth, Aimal Khan, A Bapsi Chakravarthy, Jeneth Aquino, Kristen Ciombor
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anal cancer incidence is rising in the United States, now exceeding 10 000 cases annually. Chemoradiation (CRT) is the standard curative-intent treatment for non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA), with surgery generally reserved for non-responders with persistent or progressive disease. Recent trials have refined management, supporting the assessment of response at 26 weeks before considering surgery. However, contemporary population-level patterns of upfront primary surgery and associated survival trends remain incompletely described. METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry (2004-2020), we identified adults with newly diagnosed non-metastatic anal squamous cell neoplasms (ICD-O-3 8050-8089). Outcomes were receipt of primary surgery as initial treatment and overall survival. We evaluated temporal trends (Cochran-Armitage), factors associated with primary surgery (multivariable logistic regression), and survival over time (Kaplan-Meier; multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling). RESULTS: Among 16 718 patients with non-metastatic anal cancer, 33.1% (n = 5529) underwent primary surgery and 83.7% (n = 13 997) received radiation as part of initial management. Primary surgery declined from 46.0% in 2004 to 28.7% in 2020 (trend P < 0.001), while radiation utilization was relatively stable over time (trend P = 0.106). In adjusted analyses, younger age (<50 vs 60-69 years; OR 1.614), male sex (OR 1.508), and Non-Hispanic Black race (vs Non-Hispanic White; OR 1.178) were associated with higher odds of primary surgery. Tumor factors were strongly associated with surgical use (eg, T1 vs T2: OR 3.072; higher N stage associated with lower odds). Overall survival improved across diagnosis periods (log-rank P = 0.0002); in adjusted Cox models, diagnosis in 2016-2020 (vs 2004-2007) was associated with lower mortality risk (HR 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: From 2004 to 2020, primary surgery as initial management for non-metastatic anal cancer declined substantially, consistent with increasing adoption of CRT, while overall survival improved over time. Persistent use of upfront surgery in select subgroups warrants further study to clarify indications and ensure guideline-concordant care.

The OncologistVol. 31(6)
Fox Chase Cancer Center (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), Vanderbilt University (US), University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center (US), Tennessee Oncology (US), Department of Public Health (MM), Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.