INVESTIGATING CRITICAL THINKING IN PAKISTANI ELT PRACTICES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF PUBLISHED RESEARCH

This systematic review examines how critical thinking has been addressed in published research on Pakistani ELT practices, focusing on textbooks and materials, classroom practices, and assessment practices. The reviewed studies show that critical thinking is widely valued, but its implementation remains uneven across these domains. Textbook studies indicate a dominance of lower-order tasks, while classroom research suggests that critical thinking can improve learner achievement and engagement when deliberately integrated into teaching. However, structural constraints such as examination pressure, rigid curricula, overcrowded classrooms, and limited teacher preparation continue to restrict its development. Assessment studies further show that traditional testing practices remain dominant, with limited emphasis on reasoning, evaluation, and creativity. Overall, the review concludes that critical thinking in Pakistani ELT is not absent, but insufficiently supported through aligned materials, pedagogy, and assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19648956
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INVESTIGATING CRITICAL THINKING IN PAKISTANI ELT PRACTICES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF PUBLISHED RESEARCH

Muhammad Zamir, Kainat Amjad, Sohail Falak Sher
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

INVESTIGATING CRITICAL THINKING IN PAKISTANI ELT PRACTICES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF PUBLISHED RESEARCH

Muhammad Zamir, Kainat Amjad, Sohail Falak Sher
article en

Abstract

This systematic review examines how critical thinking has been addressed in published research on Pakistani ELT practices, focusing on textbooks and materials, classroom practices, and assessment practices. The reviewed studies show that critical thinking is widely valued, but its implementation remains uneven across these domains. Textbook studies indicate a dominance of lower-order tasks, while classroom research suggests that critical thinking can improve learner achievement and engagement when deliberately integrated into teaching. However, structural constraints such as examination pressure, rigid curricula, overcrowded classrooms, and limited teacher preparation continue to restrict its development. Assessment studies further show that traditional testing practices remain dominant, with limited emphasis on reasoning, evaluation, and creativity. Overall, the review concludes that critical thinking in Pakistani ELT is not absent, but insufficiently supported through aligned materials, pedagogy, and assessment.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Girls Incorporated (US), Islamia University of Bahawalpur (PK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.