Auditability in the Digital Age

ABSTRACT In this Perspective essay, I offer some provocations about the future of auditing. I suggest that auditing is currently undergoing technological change in its practice unlike any other in its history in which notions of evidence and auditability have become fluid. The pervasiveness of algorithms in auditee systems necessitates that auditing itself becomes algorithmic in nature. Although there may be considerable efficiency benefits from this, there is a risk that auditing becomes ‘platformized’ as one app attached to auditee systems. This in turn implicates the non‐independence of the evidentiary basis of the audit. At the extreme, auditing becomes algorithmically self‐referential, and the human auditor is reduced to the ‘de‐skilled’ curator of analytical models and their decisions. At the same time, the underlying algorithms remain beyond auditability and human comprehension. I suggest that scholars have an opportunity to explore these processes empirically and that practitioners and professional institutes need to be vigilant about the side effects of technology in auditing. They must nurture the human‐centric and dialogic nature of the practice in the face of these changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Auditing
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.70038
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Auditability in the Digital Age

Michael Power
International Journal of Auditing
E-Government and Public Services
article

Auditability in the Digital Age

Michael Power
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this Perspective essay, I offer some provocations about the future of auditing. I suggest that auditing is currently undergoing technological change in its practice unlike any other in its history in which notions of evidence and auditability have become fluid. The pervasiveness of algorithms in auditee systems necessitates that auditing itself becomes algorithmic in nature. Although there may be considerable efficiency benefits from this, there is a risk that auditing becomes ‘platformized’ as one app attached to auditee systems. This in turn implicates the non‐independence of the evidentiary basis of the audit. At the extreme, auditing becomes algorithmically self‐referential, and the human auditor is reduced to the ‘de‐skilled’ curator of analytical models and their decisions. At the same time, the underlying algorithms remain beyond auditability and human comprehension. I suggest that scholars have an opportunity to explore these processes empirically and that practitioners and professional institutes need to be vigilant about the side effects of technology in auditing. They must nurture the human‐centric and dialogic nature of the practice in the face of these changes.

International Journal of Auditing
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
University of Oxford
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
E-Government and Public Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.