Beyond the breadline: a relational and comparative framework for studying charitable food provision in high-income countries

Abstract Charitable food provision (CFP) has become a central response to poverty in high-income countries. Despite growing scholarly attention, there is a notable lack of conceptual tools for the systematic comparison of CFP across different contexts. To address this gap, this article proposes a relational research framework grounded in field theory. It situates CFP at the intersection of three institutional domains: welfare systems, civil society, and the agri-food system. It then introduces three dimensions for comparative study: the diachronic (field emergence and consolidation), the synchronic (field structure, boundaries, and coordination), and the everyday life (recipients’ navigation of the CFP field). The framework offers a complementary perspective to existing studies by emphasizing institutional embeddedness, meso-level interactions, and survival strategies, while enabling systematic yet context-sensitive comparison. This article thus lays a foundation for future comparative research and invites further theoretical development that would advance understanding of CFP’s role in contemporary poverty governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Socio-Economic Review
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwag020
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the breadline: a relational and comparative framework for studying charitable food provision in high-income countries

Filippo Oncini
Socio-Economic Review
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
article

Beyond the breadline: a relational and comparative framework for studying charitable food provision in high-income countries

Filippo Oncini
article en

Abstract

Abstract Charitable food provision (CFP) has become a central response to poverty in high-income countries. Despite growing scholarly attention, there is a notable lack of conceptual tools for the systematic comparison of CFP across different contexts. To address this gap, this article proposes a relational research framework grounded in field theory. It situates CFP at the intersection of three institutional domains: welfare systems, civil society, and the agri-food system. It then introduces three dimensions for comparative study: the diachronic (field emergence and consolidation), the synchronic (field structure, boundaries, and coordination), and the everyday life (recipients’ navigation of the CFP field). The framework offers a complementary perspective to existing studies by emphasizing institutional embeddedness, meso-level interactions, and survival strategies, while enabling systematic yet context-sensitive comparison. This article thus lays a foundation for future comparative research and invites further theoretical development that would advance understanding of CFP’s role in contemporary poverty governance.

Socio-Economic Review
Maastricht University (NL)
European Commission, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond the breadline: a relational and comparative framework for studying charitable food provision in high-income countries — Filippo Oncini · Socio-Economic Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS