What are the experiences of people with psychosis, their carers and staff in inpatient mental healthcare services in the United Kingdom? A systematic review and meta‐ethnography

BACKGROUND: UK inpatient mental healthcare services face ongoing challenges of safety and staff shortages. People experiencing psychosis account for around half of admissions, with over half readmitted within 7 years. Care is organized around the therapeutic alliance between patients, their carers and staff, yet no systematic review has synthesized the views of all three groups within UK inpatient settings. AIMS: (i) To identify and appraise qualitative studies examining experiences of inpatient mental healthcare from the perspectives of patients with psychosis, carers and staff; (ii) To synthesize findings to deepen understanding of these experiences: METHOD: A systematic search of three databases identified 21 relevant studies. All were appraised using an adapted Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool. Data were extracted and synthesized using meta-ethnography. RESULTS: Study quality varied. Three key constructs emerged: (1) Power and Control in the Inpatient Setting; (2) Atmospheres of Care and (3) Connection and Recovery. Patients, carers and staff described multifaceted challenges within conflict-laden environments. Experiences ranged from confusion, disconnection, and threat to safety, understanding, and recovery, shaped by relational and communicative practises. Where patients felt informed, carers included and staff supported, experiences were more positive. Conversely, institutional routines may function as defences against emotional strain, risking relational detachment. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient services support individuals experiencing acute distress and risk, underscoring the emotional intensity of these settings. Despite policy emphasis on deinstitutionalization, inpatient care remains essential. Future research should further explore staff and carer experiences to inform relationally attuned service design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.70051
Primary Topic
Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What are the experiences of people with psychosis, their carers and staff in inpatient mental healthcare services in the United Kingdom? A systematic review and meta‐ethnography

Thomas Schröder, Lewis A. MacDonald‐Winship, Stephanie Lane
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
article

What are the experiences of people with psychosis, their carers and staff in inpatient mental healthcare services in the United Kingdom? A systematic review and meta‐ethnography

Thomas Schröder, Lewis A. MacDonald‐Winship, Stephanie Lane
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: UK inpatient mental healthcare services face ongoing challenges of safety and staff shortages. People experiencing psychosis account for around half of admissions, with over half readmitted within 7 years. Care is organized around the therapeutic alliance between patients, their carers and staff, yet no systematic review has synthesized the views of all three groups within UK inpatient settings. AIMS: (i) To identify and appraise qualitative studies examining experiences of inpatient mental healthcare from the perspectives of patients with psychosis, carers and staff; (ii) To synthesize findings to deepen understanding of these experiences: METHOD: A systematic search of three databases identified 21 relevant studies. All were appraised using an adapted Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool. Data were extracted and synthesized using meta-ethnography. RESULTS: Study quality varied. Three key constructs emerged: (1) Power and Control in the Inpatient Setting; (2) Atmospheres of Care and (3) Connection and Recovery. Patients, carers and staff described multifaceted challenges within conflict-laden environments. Experiences ranged from confusion, disconnection, and threat to safety, understanding, and recovery, shaped by relational and communicative practises. Where patients felt informed, carers included and staff supported, experiences were more positive. Conversely, institutional routines may function as defences against emotional strain, risking relational detachment. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient services support individuals experiencing acute distress and risk, underscoring the emotional intensity of these settings. Despite policy emphasis on deinstitutionalization, inpatient care remains essential. Future research should further explore staff and carer experiences to inform relationally attuned service design.

British Journal of Clinical Psychology
University of Nottingham (GB), Institute of Mental Health (GB), University of Lincoln (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.