Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Coronary Disease in Adults ≥ 75 versus < 75 Years

BACKGROUND: While PCI is widely used for chronic coronary disease (CCD), older adults (≥ 75 years) face distinct procedural risks, and their outcomes compared with younger patients remain incompletely understood. METHODS: We investigated age-related differences in health outcomes following PCI for CCD using Vizient Clinical Data Base that includes both inpatient and outpatient PCI. Vizient aggregates clinical and outcome data from over 97% of U.S. academic medical centers and 1000+ community hospitals. We included all patients that underwent PCI for CCD between January 2016 and June 2022. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). After propensity-score matching older (≥ 75 years) and younger (< 75 years) adults, we analyzed major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in the year following index PCI using Kaplan-Meier curves. Relative risks (RR) were calculated using Zou's modified Poisson approach. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, repeat PCI, major bleeding, and cardiovascular-related hospitalizations. RESULTS: A total of 176,492 patients were included. 70.5% of patients were < 75 years old, while 29.5% were ≥ 75 years old. Most PCIs for CCD occurred in the outpatient setting (51.0%), followed by inpatient (28.6%), observation (17.1%), and other (3.3%) settings. Older adults experienced lower adjusted risk of MACE (relative risk [RR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-0.96), as well as MI or repeat PCI, compared with younger adults. They experienced higher risk of hospitalization for a cardiovascular cause (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.36-1.44). No significant difference was observed in the risk of all-cause mortality or major bleeding. CONCLUSION: After adjusting for baseline differences, older adults who undergo PCI for CCD have a risk of MACE and major bleeding that is comparable to younger patients. However, older adults do experience higher rates of subsequent cardiovascular hospitalizations following PCI for CCD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70457
Primary Topic
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Coronary Disease in Adults ≥ 75 versus < 75 Years

Darrick K. Li, Zafer Akman, Sumit Sohal, Michael G. Nanna et al.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
article

Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Coronary Disease in Adults ≥ 75 versus < 75 Years

Darrick K. Li, Zafer Akman, Sumit Sohal, Michael G. Nanna, Ajar Kochar, Jiun‐Ruey Hu, Jennifer Frampton, Dae Yong Park, Mohammad AL Mouslmani, Greta Campbell, Shefa Arya Nezhad, R Rossi, Armin Nouri, Laura‐M Romero, Abdulla A. Damluji
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While PCI is widely used for chronic coronary disease (CCD), older adults (≥ 75 years) face distinct procedural risks, and their outcomes compared with younger patients remain incompletely understood. METHODS: We investigated age-related differences in health outcomes following PCI for CCD using Vizient Clinical Data Base that includes both inpatient and outpatient PCI. Vizient aggregates clinical and outcome data from over 97% of U.S. academic medical centers and 1000+ community hospitals. We included all patients that underwent PCI for CCD between January 2016 and June 2022. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). After propensity-score matching older (≥ 75 years) and younger (< 75 years) adults, we analyzed major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in the year following index PCI using Kaplan-Meier curves. Relative risks (RR) were calculated using Zou's modified Poisson approach. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, repeat PCI, major bleeding, and cardiovascular-related hospitalizations. RESULTS: A total of 176,492 patients were included. 70.5% of patients were < 75 years old, while 29.5% were ≥ 75 years old. Most PCIs for CCD occurred in the outpatient setting (51.0%), followed by inpatient (28.6%), observation (17.1%), and other (3.3%) settings. Older adults experienced lower adjusted risk of MACE (relative risk [RR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-0.96), as well as MI or repeat PCI, compared with younger adults. They experienced higher risk of hospitalization for a cardiovascular cause (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.36-1.44). No significant difference was observed in the risk of all-cause mortality or major bleeding. CONCLUSION: After adjusting for baseline differences, older adults who undergo PCI for CCD have a risk of MACE and major bleeding that is comparable to younger patients. However, older adults do experience higher rates of subsequent cardiovascular hospitalizations following PCI for CCD.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Yale New Haven Hospital (US), Cleveland Foundation (US), Yale University (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute (US), Vascular Institute of New York (US)
National Institute on Aging
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.