The micro-process rating system for psychotherapeutic interventions - CBT (RPI-CBT): development and validation

OBJECTIVE: Psychotherapy process research examines what happens within therapy sessions to clarify how therapeutic change unfolds, a scope expanded through modern observational methods. Building on this development, the rating system systematically identifies cognitive-behavioral interventions at the micro-process level, including their duration, and frequency. METHOD: to assess the inter-rater reliability. Descriptive analyses were conducted to illustrate which interventions were captured and how they could be differentiated. RESULTS: = .499 - .892). Primarily, interventions from early therapeutic phases were identified and clearly distinguishable from one another. CONCLUSION: Overall, the RPI-CBT emerged as a reliable rating system capable of identifying and differentiating cognitive-behavioral interventions, although not all interventions were captured.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychotherapy Research
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2026.2653993
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The micro-process rating system for psychotherapeutic interventions - CBT (RPI-CBT): development and validation

K.V. Da Cunha Goncalves, Christopher Lalk, T. Steinbrenner, M. I. Hehlmann et al.
Psychotherapy Research
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

The micro-process rating system for psychotherapeutic interventions - CBT (RPI-CBT): development and validation

K.V. Da Cunha Goncalves, Christopher Lalk, T. Steinbrenner, M. I. Hehlmann, J. A. Rubel, J. S. Könitz, W. Lutz, F. Günther, F. Iovoli
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Psychotherapy process research examines what happens within therapy sessions to clarify how therapeutic change unfolds, a scope expanded through modern observational methods. Building on this development, the rating system systematically identifies cognitive-behavioral interventions at the micro-process level, including their duration, and frequency. METHOD: to assess the inter-rater reliability. Descriptive analyses were conducted to illustrate which interventions were captured and how they could be differentiated. RESULTS: = .499 - .892). Primarily, interventions from early therapeutic phases were identified and clearly distinguishable from one another. CONCLUSION: Overall, the RPI-CBT emerged as a reliable rating system capable of identifying and differentiating cognitive-behavioral interventions, although not all interventions were captured.

Psychotherapy Research
Osnabrück University (DE), Universität Trier (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The micro-process rating system for psychotherapeutic interventions - CBT (RPI-CBT): development and validation — K.V. Da Cunha Goncalves, Christopher Lalk, et al. · Psychotherapy Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS