Are Reference Intervals for Calculated Free Testosterone in Healthy Men Reliable Also in Men With Erectile Dysfunction? Findings From a Cross‐Sectional Study

BACKGROUND: Reference intervals for calculated free testosterone (cFT) in healthy, nonobese men have been released, but have not been validated in men with erectile dysfunction (ED). OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical impact of new cFT reference intervals in men with new-onset ED. METHODS: Data from 410 healthy, nonobese men were analyzed (2015-2023). cFT was assessed using Vermeulen's formula and compared to Jasuja et al.'s (2022) reference values, using the 2.5th percentile as a pathological threshold. At baseline, all patients completed the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Descriptive statistics and linear regression analyses were applied. RESULTS: Median (IQR) age and total testosterone at presentation were 48 (38-59) years and 4.7 (3.3-6.1) ng/mL. Median IIEF-EF score was 18 (8-23), with 134 patients (32.8%) reporting severe ED. Percentiles of cFT in ED men were: 2.5th = 10, 10th = 50, 50th = 90, 90th = 150, and 97.5th = 227.5 pg/mL, compared to 66, 91, 141, 240, and 309 pg/mL in healthy controls. Seventy-four had cFT between 10 and 66 pg/mL, normal for ED distribution but pathological by healthy reference. This group was older (p<0.01), had lower IIEF-EF (p<0.001), and higher BDI (p<0.01) versus those with cFT >66 pg/mL, though other parameters were similar. Severe ED rates were 72.7%, 44.6%, and 28.7% in men with cFT <10, 10-66, and >66 pg/mL (p<0.01). At multivariable regression, cFT >66 pg/mL was linked to higher IIEF-EF (p = 0.02), while cFT >66 pg/mL (p = 0.03) and younger age (p = 0.01) were associated with lower BDI scores. CONCLUSIONS: Reference thresholds for cFT derived from healthy men identify, among men with ED, a subgroup showing a less favorable erectile and psychometric profile. These findings suggest that healthy-derived cFT reference values may provide clinically useful information in the assessment of men presenting with ED.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Andrology
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.70235
Primary Topic
Hormonal and reproductive studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are Reference Intervals for Calculated Free Testosterone in Healthy Men Reliable Also in Men With Erectile Dysfunction? Findings From a Cross‐Sectional Study

E. Montanari, Andrea Salonia, Edoardo Pozzi, Fausto Negri et al.
Andrology
Hormonal and reproductive studies
article

Are Reference Intervals for Calculated Free Testosterone in Healthy Men Reliable Also in Men With Erectile Dysfunction? Findings From a Cross‐Sectional Study

E. Montanari, Andrea Salonia, Edoardo Pozzi, Fausto Negri, Luca Boeri, Christian Corsini, Federica Passarelli, Alessandro Bertini, Alessia d'Arma, Massimiliano Raffo, Francesco Montorsi
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reference intervals for calculated free testosterone (cFT) in healthy, nonobese men have been released, but have not been validated in men with erectile dysfunction (ED). OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical impact of new cFT reference intervals in men with new-onset ED. METHODS: Data from 410 healthy, nonobese men were analyzed (2015-2023). cFT was assessed using Vermeulen's formula and compared to Jasuja et al.'s (2022) reference values, using the 2.5th percentile as a pathological threshold. At baseline, all patients completed the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Descriptive statistics and linear regression analyses were applied. RESULTS: Median (IQR) age and total testosterone at presentation were 48 (38-59) years and 4.7 (3.3-6.1) ng/mL. Median IIEF-EF score was 18 (8-23), with 134 patients (32.8%) reporting severe ED. Percentiles of cFT in ED men were: 2.5th = 10, 10th = 50, 50th = 90, 90th = 150, and 97.5th = 227.5 pg/mL, compared to 66, 91, 141, 240, and 309 pg/mL in healthy controls. Seventy-four had cFT between 10 and 66 pg/mL, normal for ED distribution but pathological by healthy reference. This group was older (p<0.01), had lower IIEF-EF (p<0.001), and higher BDI (p<0.01) versus those with cFT >66 pg/mL, though other parameters were similar. Severe ED rates were 72.7%, 44.6%, and 28.7% in men with cFT <10, 10-66, and >66 pg/mL (p<0.01). At multivariable regression, cFT >66 pg/mL was linked to higher IIEF-EF (p = 0.02), while cFT >66 pg/mL (p = 0.03) and younger age (p = 0.01) were associated with lower BDI scores. CONCLUSIONS: Reference thresholds for cFT derived from healthy men identify, among men with ED, a subgroup showing a less favorable erectile and psychometric profile. These findings suggest that healthy-derived cFT reference values may provide clinically useful information in the assessment of men presenting with ED.

Andrology
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), University of Milan (IT), Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Hormonal and reproductive studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.