Optimization Trade-Offs in Memristor-Based Crossbar Arrays for MAC Acceleration

Vector–matrix multiplication (VMM), implemented through multiply–accumulate (MAC) operations, represents the dominant computational primitive in many artificial intelligence (AI) workloads. When executed on conventional von Neumann architectures, VMM operations suffer from important energy consumption and latency due to the separation between memory and processing units. To overcome these limitations, crossbar arrays built from Resistive Random Access Memory (RRAM) cells have been proposed for accelerating VMM computations. In this work, we investigate the key optimization trade-offs associated with implementing RRAM-based neural networks for classification applications. A simple two-layer neural network is first defined and trained in software to generate the weight matrices and bias parameters. Next, three hardware implementation scenarios are evaluated depending on whether negative floating-point numbers are used: Positive Weights Only (PWO), Positive and Negative Weights Only (PNWO), and Positive and Negative Weights with Biases (PNWB). The different implementations are analyzed at the hardware level by examining classification accuracy, energy efficiency, latency, and area overhead. The study further incorporates important RRAM limitations, including restricted conductance range and device variability. Hardware results show that the PWO scenario offers the lowest energy consumption (189 fJ/MAC) and area overhead but results in the lowest accuracy. PNWO and PNWB significantly improve accuracy (+177% and +180%) but increase energy consumption (+63% and +87%) and area (×2 and ×2.1). Under variability effects, PWO achieves better accuracy (94.65%), followed by PNWO (93.11%) and PNWB (92.11%).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15081710
Primary Topic
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization Trade-Offs in Memristor-Based Crossbar Arrays for MAC Acceleration

Moritz Fieback, Mottaqiallah Taouil, Hanzhi Xun, Hassen Aziza et al.
Electronics
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
article

Optimization Trade-Offs in Memristor-Based Crossbar Arrays for MAC Acceleration

Moritz Fieback, Mottaqiallah Taouil, Hanzhi Xun, Hassen Aziza, Said Hamdioui
article en

Abstract

Vector–matrix multiplication (VMM), implemented through multiply–accumulate (MAC) operations, represents the dominant computational primitive in many artificial intelligence (AI) workloads. When executed on conventional von Neumann architectures, VMM operations suffer from important energy consumption and latency due to the separation between memory and processing units. To overcome these limitations, crossbar arrays built from Resistive Random Access Memory (RRAM) cells have been proposed for accelerating VMM computations. In this work, we investigate the key optimization trade-offs associated with implementing RRAM-based neural networks for classification applications. A simple two-layer neural network is first defined and trained in software to generate the weight matrices and bias parameters. Next, three hardware implementation scenarios are evaluated depending on whether negative floating-point numbers are used: Positive Weights Only (PWO), Positive and Negative Weights Only (PNWO), and Positive and Negative Weights with Biases (PNWB). The different implementations are analyzed at the hardware level by examining classification accuracy, energy efficiency, latency, and area overhead. The study further incorporates important RRAM limitations, including restricted conductance range and device variability. Hardware results show that the PWO scenario offers the lowest energy consumption (189 fJ/MAC) and area overhead but results in the lowest accuracy. PNWO and PNWB significantly improve accuracy (+177% and +180%) but increase energy consumption (+63% and +87%) and area (×2 and ×2.1). Under variability effects, PWO achieves better accuracy (94.65%), followed by PNWO (93.11%) and PNWB (92.11%).

ElectronicsVol. 15(8)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.