A Review of Potential Complications of Pulsed Field Ablation for AF: Beneath the Surface

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) for AF has changed the landscape of AF treatment globally. While clinical trial data have shown non-inferiority compared with thermal ablation, the safety profile of this technology is still being understood. Large post-approval registry data are now accumulating and have invariably demonstrated that rather than PFA being necessarily safer than conventional thermal ablation, the safety profile is simply different. Pericardial tamponade remains a risk and may even be greater compared with thermal ablation. Coronary artery spasm has been recognised, particularly with off-label use of PFA. Haemolysis and associated acute kidney injury are unique complications related to PFA. Stroke risk persists with likely multiple causes. Other complications, such as femoral venous injury, vagal responses and transient phrenic nerve injury, are increasingly recognised. In this review, we summarise recent data regarding potential complications associated with PFA, including mechanisms, risk factors, management and prevention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15420/aer.2025.54
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Review of Potential Complications of Pulsed Field Ablation for AF: Beneath the Surface

F. Ha, Tai Ermongkonchai, Emily Kotschet, AN Brown et al.
Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
article

A Review of Potential Complications of Pulsed Field Ablation for AF: Beneath the Surface

F. Ha, Tai Ermongkonchai, Emily Kotschet, AN Brown, N Nerlekar, H C Han
article en

Abstract

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) for AF has changed the landscape of AF treatment globally. While clinical trial data have shown non-inferiority compared with thermal ablation, the safety profile of this technology is still being understood. Large post-approval registry data are now accumulating and have invariably demonstrated that rather than PFA being necessarily safer than conventional thermal ablation, the safety profile is simply different. Pericardial tamponade remains a risk and may even be greater compared with thermal ablation. Coronary artery spasm has been recognised, particularly with off-label use of PFA. Haemolysis and associated acute kidney injury are unique complications related to PFA. Stroke risk persists with likely multiple causes. Other complications, such as femoral venous injury, vagal responses and transient phrenic nerve injury, are increasingly recognised. In this review, we summarise recent data regarding potential complications associated with PFA, including mechanisms, risk factors, management and prevention.

Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology ReviewVol. 15
Monash Health (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.