Comparative efficacy of behavioral therapy (SLEEPwindow) and cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia − a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial

Chronic insomnia disorder affects up to 10% of the general population and 30% of those with mental disorders. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) is the first-line treatment, but its implementation remains challenging. The SLEEPwindow intervention focuses on the behavioral module of CBT-I (bedtime restriction, stimulus control) and may be an effective, brief, and cost-effective standalone intervention for outpatients with chronic insomnia disorder. This study evaluates whether SLEEPwindow is non-inferior to full CBT-I. This is a non-inferiority trial comparing CBT-I and the SLEEPwindow intervention. A total of 130 patients with chronic insomnia disorder will be randomized into two groups: CBT-I (six 90-minute group sessions) and SLEEPwindow (four 60-minute group sessions). CBT-I includes sleep education, stimulus control, cognitive therapy, relaxation, and bedtime restriction. SLEEPwindow focuses on the behavioral module of CBT-I (bedtime restriction and stimulus control), as a standalone intervention. The primary outcome is the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), measured at baseline, 6 weeks (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3). Secondary outcomes include subjective sleep quality (sleep diaries), daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), sleep-related quality of life (Glasgow Sleep Impact Index), treatment adherence (actigraphy, sleep diaries), subjective treatment experience, and assessment of treatment costs. The primary hypothesis is that SLEEPwindow is non-inferior to CBT-I across time for improving insomnia severity. Non-inferiority will be defined as a difference of no more than 2 points on the ISI, assessed using a one-sided 97.5% confidence interval. The primary hypothesis of this trial is that SLEEPwindow is non-inferior to full CBT-I. If confirmed, SLEEPwindow could become a more accessible and cost-effective treatment. The study will also provide insights into treatment mechanisms and implementation challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbct.2026.100586
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative efficacy of behavioral therapy (SLEEPwindow) and cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia − a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial

Tobias Krieger, Pauline Henckaerts, Carlotta L. Schneider, Christoph Nissen et al.
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy
Sleep and related disorders
article

Comparative efficacy of behavioral therapy (SLEEPwindow) and cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia − a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial

Tobias Krieger, Pauline Henckaerts, Carlotta L. Schneider, Christoph Nissen, Marie Angelillo, Elisabeth Hertenstein, Kristoffer D. Fehér, Thomas Berger
article en

Abstract

Chronic insomnia disorder affects up to 10% of the general population and 30% of those with mental disorders. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) is the first-line treatment, but its implementation remains challenging. The SLEEPwindow intervention focuses on the behavioral module of CBT-I (bedtime restriction, stimulus control) and may be an effective, brief, and cost-effective standalone intervention for outpatients with chronic insomnia disorder. This study evaluates whether SLEEPwindow is non-inferior to full CBT-I. This is a non-inferiority trial comparing CBT-I and the SLEEPwindow intervention. A total of 130 patients with chronic insomnia disorder will be randomized into two groups: CBT-I (six 90-minute group sessions) and SLEEPwindow (four 60-minute group sessions). CBT-I includes sleep education, stimulus control, cognitive therapy, relaxation, and bedtime restriction. SLEEPwindow focuses on the behavioral module of CBT-I (bedtime restriction and stimulus control), as a standalone intervention. The primary outcome is the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), measured at baseline, 6 weeks (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3). Secondary outcomes include subjective sleep quality (sleep diaries), daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), sleep-related quality of life (Glasgow Sleep Impact Index), treatment adherence (actigraphy, sleep diaries), subjective treatment experience, and assessment of treatment costs. The primary hypothesis is that SLEEPwindow is non-inferior to CBT-I across time for improving insomnia severity. Non-inferiority will be defined as a difference of no more than 2 points on the ISI, assessed using a one-sided 97.5% confidence interval. The primary hypothesis of this trial is that SLEEPwindow is non-inferior to full CBT-I. If confirmed, SLEEPwindow could become a more accessible and cost-effective treatment. The study will also provide insights into treatment mechanisms and implementation challenges.

Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive TherapyVol. 36(3)
University of Geneva (CH), University of Bern (CH), Geneva College (US)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Sleep and related disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.