Sustainable Bridge Construction Decisions Using Fuzzy MCDM: A Comprehensive Comparison of AHP–VIKOR, BWM–VIKOR, and TOPSIS

The selection of bridge construction systems significantly influences the sustainability of infrastructure projects, encompassing both economic and environmental dimensions. This study presents a comparative assessment of three hybrid fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques, Fuzzy AHP–VIKOR, Fuzzy TOPSIS, and Fuzzy BWM–VIKOR, for choosing optimum bridge construction system during the preliminary design phases. Each method was applied consistently, integrating project-specific criteria and construction alternatives. The comparison extended beyond the final rankings to assess computational efficiency, sensitivity to input variations, ease of implementation, and stability. Expert opinions were gathered using semi-structured interviews and questionnaires to reflect the practical circumstances of bridge engineering in the field. The results show distinct strengths and trade-offs among the techniques, offering valuable insights for researchers and industry professionals alike. This study contributes to the knowledge base by explaining how different fuzzy MCDM methods are used in real-world bridge construction projects. These outcomes improve the methodological rigor of decision science and support more robust decision-making frameworks in bridge engineering.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18084013
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable Bridge Construction Decisions Using Fuzzy MCDM: A Comprehensive Comparison of AHP–VIKOR, BWM–VIKOR, and TOPSIS

Ahmed Hussien Elyamany, Alaa ElMarkaby
Sustainability
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Sustainable Bridge Construction Decisions Using Fuzzy MCDM: A Comprehensive Comparison of AHP–VIKOR, BWM–VIKOR, and TOPSIS

Ahmed Hussien Elyamany, Alaa ElMarkaby
article en

Abstract

The selection of bridge construction systems significantly influences the sustainability of infrastructure projects, encompassing both economic and environmental dimensions. This study presents a comparative assessment of three hybrid fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques, Fuzzy AHP–VIKOR, Fuzzy TOPSIS, and Fuzzy BWM–VIKOR, for choosing optimum bridge construction system during the preliminary design phases. Each method was applied consistently, integrating project-specific criteria and construction alternatives. The comparison extended beyond the final rankings to assess computational efficiency, sensitivity to input variations, ease of implementation, and stability. Expert opinions were gathered using semi-structured interviews and questionnaires to reflect the practical circumstances of bridge engineering in the field. The results show distinct strengths and trade-offs among the techniques, offering valuable insights for researchers and industry professionals alike. This study contributes to the knowledge base by explaining how different fuzzy MCDM methods are used in real-world bridge construction projects. These outcomes improve the methodological rigor of decision science and support more robust decision-making frameworks in bridge engineering.

SustainabilityVol. 18(8)
British University in Egypt (EG), Arab Academy for Science, Technology, and Maritime Transport (EG), Academy of Scientific Research and Technology (EG)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.