Can household ultrasonic cleaners enhance the stain removal efficacy of chemical agents on orthodontic aligners?

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of household ultrasonic cleaning with/without peroxide-based and peroxide-free cleaning methods for stain removal on polyurethane aligner material. Seventy-two polyurethane aligner specimens (Invisalign, Align Technology Inc.) were stained for seven days in a standardized coffee solution and randomly assigned to six cleaning protocols (n = 12/group): peroxide-free cleaner (Invisalign Cleaning Crystals [ICC], Align Technology Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) or peroxide-based cleaner (Corega Proguard [CP], Stafford-Miller Limited, Waterford, Ireland), each applied without, 5, or 10 min of household ultrasonic assistance (Shantou Huan Te Tong Intelligent Technology Co., Guangdong, China; Serial No: 20240001) at 50 kHz. Color was measured at baseline (t0), after staining (t1), and after ultrasonuc cleaning (t2) using a spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade Compact; VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany). The CIEDE2000 formula was used to calculate color changes (ΔE00), specifically evaluating staining (ΔEt0-t1), net color change ((ΔEt0-t2), and cleaning efficacy (ΔEt1-t2). Data were analyzed using Repeated Measures and two-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni adjustment (significant at p < 0.017). All specimens showed comparable discoloration after staining (p > 0.05). Cleaning efficacy (ΔEt1–t2) did not differ between cleaning agents, ultrasonic durations, or their interaction (p > 0.05). Net color change (ΔEt0–t2) differed between agents (p = 0.018), with ICC exhibiting lower residual discoloration than CP. Although a significant agent-ultrasonic interaction was detected (p = 0.043), Bonferroni-adjusted post-hoc comparisons did not reveal any statistically significant pairwise differences between individual cleaning protocols. Household ultrasonic cleaning did not improve the stain-removal efficacy of either cleaning agent. Color recovery was primarily influenced by the chemical formulation of the cleaner rather than ultrasonic assistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08319-1
Primary Topic
Dental Erosion and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can household ultrasonic cleaners enhance the stain removal efficacy of chemical agents on orthodontic aligners?

Genta Agani Sabah, Enver Yetkiner, Aslı Aşık, Yağmur Lena Sezici et al.
BMC Oral Health
Dental Erosion and Treatment
article

Can household ultrasonic cleaners enhance the stain removal efficacy of chemical agents on orthodontic aligners?

Genta Agani Sabah, Enver Yetkiner, Aslı Aşık, Yağmur Lena Sezici, Sibel Acar
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of household ultrasonic cleaning with/without peroxide-based and peroxide-free cleaning methods for stain removal on polyurethane aligner material. Seventy-two polyurethane aligner specimens (Invisalign, Align Technology Inc.) were stained for seven days in a standardized coffee solution and randomly assigned to six cleaning protocols (n = 12/group): peroxide-free cleaner (Invisalign Cleaning Crystals [ICC], Align Technology Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) or peroxide-based cleaner (Corega Proguard [CP], Stafford-Miller Limited, Waterford, Ireland), each applied without, 5, or 10 min of household ultrasonic assistance (Shantou Huan Te Tong Intelligent Technology Co., Guangdong, China; Serial No: 20240001) at 50 kHz. Color was measured at baseline (t0), after staining (t1), and after ultrasonuc cleaning (t2) using a spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade Compact; VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany). The CIEDE2000 formula was used to calculate color changes (ΔE00), specifically evaluating staining (ΔEt0-t1), net color change ((ΔEt0-t2), and cleaning efficacy (ΔEt1-t2). Data were analyzed using Repeated Measures and two-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni adjustment (significant at p < 0.017). All specimens showed comparable discoloration after staining (p > 0.05). Cleaning efficacy (ΔEt1–t2) did not differ between cleaning agents, ultrasonic durations, or their interaction (p > 0.05). Net color change (ΔEt0–t2) differed between agents (p = 0.018), with ICC exhibiting lower residual discoloration than CP. Although a significant agent-ultrasonic interaction was detected (p = 0.043), Bonferroni-adjusted post-hoc comparisons did not reveal any statistically significant pairwise differences between individual cleaning protocols. Household ultrasonic cleaning did not improve the stain-removal efficacy of either cleaning agent. Color recovery was primarily influenced by the chemical formulation of the cleaner rather than ultrasonic assistance.

BMC Oral Health
Izmir University (TR), İzmir University of Economics (TR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Dental Erosion and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.