Abstract LB327: Optimizing fludarabine exposure in pediatric CAR T-cell patients through an adaptive dosing approach

Abstract Background: B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is the most common cancer in children and young adults. While initial response rates are high (∼90%), 15-20% of patients relapse within 2 years, and outcomes for relapsed or refractory (r/r) disease are poor. CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy offers a potential cure for r/r B-ALL, but relapse currently occurs in approximately 50% of patients. Lymphodepletion with fludarabine (Flu) and cyclophosphamide is essential for CAR T-cell expansion and efficacy, with recent data showing that Flu exposure strongly correlates with outcome. Cumulative area under the curve (cAUC) values <14 mg.h/L were associated with shorter leukemia-free survival (1.8 vs 12.9 months) and higher CD19⁺ relapse (100% vs 27.4%). Notably, 40% of patients achieved suboptimal exposures (Dekker et al 2022), suggesting that therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to individualize Flu exposure may be beneficial. Methods: r/r B-ALL patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy were recruited to the NCCPG TDM 2018 clinical trial (ISRCTN10139334). Patients received 30 mg/m2/day Flu for 4 days and ≥4 plasma samples were taken per patient over the first 24 hours post Flu infusion for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis. Plasma concentrations were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PK analysis was conducted using a 3-compartment population PK model in InsightRX. Analysis was conducted in real time with dose adjustments implemented to target a cAUC within the therapeutic window of 16-20 mg.h/L. For a proportion of patients, further PK analysis was conducted on day 4 post dose adjustment. PK analysis was conducted with and without the inclusion of patient specific concentration-time data to assess the appropriateness of model-based dosing (MBD). Results: To date, analysis has been conducted for 21 patients. Estimated cAUCs were variable (10.2-26 mg.h/L) with no trends between exposure and age or weight. 81% of patients (17/21) required dose adjustments to achieve exposures within the therapeutic window. Without dose adjustments, nine patients would have achieved exposures <16mg.h/L, putting them at risk of CAR-T failure, with eight patients achieving exposures >20mg.h/L, increasing risk of drug toxicity. Three patients underwent additional TDM to validate dose adjustments, with final cAUCs within 6% of target exposures. Model-predicted exposures were significantly different from exposure predictions incorporating concentration-time data, with exposures outside the therapeutic window predicted in 47% of patients using MBD alone. Conclusions: Preliminary data indicate considerable interpatient variability in Flu exposure in r/r B-ALL patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy. BSA-based dosing and MBD approaches may be inadequate, demonstrating the need for adaptive dosing. TDM is feasible with Flu dosed across 4 days and leads to accurate target exposure attainment. Citation Format: Emma Barlow, Su Han Lum, Geoff Shenton, Denise Bonney, Rachael Hough, Sophie Hambleton, Gareth Veal, Shelby Barnett. Optimizing fludarabine exposure in pediatric CAR T-cell patients through an adaptive dosing approach [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr LB327.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-lb327
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract LB327: Optimizing fludarabine exposure in pediatric CAR T-cell patients through an adaptive dosing approach

Gareth Veal, Su Han Lum, Sophie Hambleton, S. Barnett et al.
Cancer Research
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

Abstract LB327: Optimizing fludarabine exposure in pediatric CAR T-cell patients through an adaptive dosing approach

Gareth Veal, Su Han Lum, Sophie Hambleton, S. Barnett, Denise Bonney, Emma Barlow, Geoff Shenton, Rachael Hough
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is the most common cancer in children and young adults. While initial response rates are high (∼90%), 15-20% of patients relapse within 2 years, and outcomes for relapsed or refractory (r/r) disease are poor. CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy offers a potential cure for r/r B-ALL, but relapse currently occurs in approximately 50% of patients. Lymphodepletion with fludarabine (Flu) and cyclophosphamide is essential for CAR T-cell expansion and efficacy, with recent data showing that Flu exposure strongly correlates with outcome. Cumulative area under the curve (cAUC) values <14 mg.h/L were associated with shorter leukemia-free survival (1.8 vs 12.9 months) and higher CD19⁺ relapse (100% vs 27.4%). Notably, 40% of patients achieved suboptimal exposures (Dekker et al 2022), suggesting that therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to individualize Flu exposure may be beneficial. Methods: r/r B-ALL patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy were recruited to the NCCPG TDM 2018 clinical trial (ISRCTN10139334). Patients received 30 mg/m2/day Flu for 4 days and ≥4 plasma samples were taken per patient over the first 24 hours post Flu infusion for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis. Plasma concentrations were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PK analysis was conducted using a 3-compartment population PK model in InsightRX. Analysis was conducted in real time with dose adjustments implemented to target a cAUC within the therapeutic window of 16-20 mg.h/L. For a proportion of patients, further PK analysis was conducted on day 4 post dose adjustment. PK analysis was conducted with and without the inclusion of patient specific concentration-time data to assess the appropriateness of model-based dosing (MBD). Results: To date, analysis has been conducted for 21 patients. Estimated cAUCs were variable (10.2-26 mg.h/L) with no trends between exposure and age or weight. 81% of patients (17/21) required dose adjustments to achieve exposures within the therapeutic window. Without dose adjustments, nine patients would have achieved exposures <16mg.h/L, putting them at risk of CAR-T failure, with eight patients achieving exposures >20mg.h/L, increasing risk of drug toxicity. Three patients underwent additional TDM to validate dose adjustments, with final cAUCs within 6% of target exposures. Model-predicted exposures were significantly different from exposure predictions incorporating concentration-time data, with exposures outside the therapeutic window predicted in 47% of patients using MBD alone. Conclusions: Preliminary data indicate considerable interpatient variability in Flu exposure in r/r B-ALL patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy. BSA-based dosing and MBD approaches may be inadequate, demonstrating the need for adaptive dosing. TDM is feasible with Flu dosed across 4 days and leads to accurate target exposure attainment. Citation Format: Emma Barlow, Su Han Lum, Geoff Shenton, Denise Bonney, Rachael Hough, Sophie Hambleton, Gareth Veal, Shelby Barnett. Optimizing fludarabine exposure in pediatric CAR T-cell patients through an adaptive dosing approach [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr LB327.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(8_Supplement)
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University College London (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.