Allocation of Taxing Rights Regarding Derivatives: Domestic Law and Tax Treaties

Cross-border derivatives have been thriving. However, there is uncertainty regarding the allocation of the right to tax them on both the domestic law level and the tax treaty level. Currently, Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States do not levy source tax on cross-border derivatives. However, the United Kingdom and the United States may recognize interests from derivative payments and levy withholding tax; and the United States regards some dividend-equivalent payments as dividends for tax treatment, which bring the risks of qualification conflicts among tax treaties and thereby double taxation. Another potential qualification conflict arises from different criteria for business profits in different jurisdictions. Because most tax treaties provide little or no guidance on the treatment of derivatives, their income characterization often depends primarily on domestic law. Certain tax treaties even explicitly accept one of the contracting parties’ domestic rules for income characterization. In current tax treaty practice, alongside domestic law, both the treaty context and the specific characteristics of the derivatives themselves play a decisive role, suggesting an emerging expectation that the income characterization of derivatives may eventually become more harmonized under tax treaties.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Finance and Capital Markets (formerly Derivatives & Financial Instruments)
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59403/1sbnnjz
Primary Topic
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Allocation of Taxing Rights Regarding Derivatives: Domestic Law and Tax Treaties

Xinyi Li
Finance and Capital Markets (formerly Derivatives & Financial Instruments)
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
article

Allocation of Taxing Rights Regarding Derivatives: Domestic Law and Tax Treaties

Xinyi Li
article en

Abstract

Cross-border derivatives have been thriving. However, there is uncertainty regarding the allocation of the right to tax them on both the domestic law level and the tax treaty level. Currently, Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States do not levy source tax on cross-border derivatives. However, the United Kingdom and the United States may recognize interests from derivative payments and levy withholding tax; and the United States regards some dividend-equivalent payments as dividends for tax treatment, which bring the risks of qualification conflicts among tax treaties and thereby double taxation. Another potential qualification conflict arises from different criteria for business profits in different jurisdictions. Because most tax treaties provide little or no guidance on the treatment of derivatives, their income characterization often depends primarily on domestic law. Certain tax treaties even explicitly accept one of the contracting parties’ domestic rules for income characterization. In current tax treaty practice, alongside domestic law, both the treaty context and the specific characteristics of the derivatives themselves play a decisive role, suggesting an emerging expectation that the income characterization of derivatives may eventually become more harmonized under tax treaties.

Finance and Capital Markets (formerly Derivatives & Financial Instruments)Vol. 27(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.