Coordinated Return-to-Work model reduces sickness absences after hip or knee arthroplasty: a registry-based study

Working-age adults increasingly undergo total hip (THA) and knee (KA) arthroplasties. We evaluated how post-arthroplasty referral to occupational health services (OHS) using the Coordinated Return-to-Work (CRTW) model, affects return to work (RTW). The CRTW model was evaluated through a benchmarking controlled trial. We used the electronic records of four hospitals in Finland to identify working-age THA and total/unicondylar KA patients before (control group, N = 668) and after (intervention group, N = 536) the CRTW model was implemented. We combined these data with sickness benefits registry data. The differences between the study groups’ RTW were analyzed using a Cox regression model, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, number of special reimbursement entitlements for medicines, and earnings as covariates. Subgroup analyses included intervention participants whose sick leaves were prescribed by a surgeon according to the CRTW protocol. After THA, the control group’s mean RTW-duration was 87.8 days, compared to 74.9 days for the intervention group, with the mean difference being 12.9 days (95% CI 5.7–20.2). The intervention group was associated with earlier RTW; HR 1.35 (95% CI 1.13–1.61). After KA, the control group’s mean RTW-duration was 107.8 days, while the intervention group’s was 93.4 days, with the mean difference being 14.4 days (95% CI 5.9–22.9), HR 1.29 (95% CI 1.09–1.54). In the subgroup analyses, the mean RTW-duration in the specifically targeted intervention groups was 60.2 days after THA and 84.7 days after KA. The mean differences compared with the control groups were 27.6 days (95% CI 19.1–36.1), HR 2.96 (95% CI 2.22–3.95) and 23.1 days (95% CI 10.9–35.3), HR 1.51 (95% CI 1.18–1.95), respectively. The CRTW model effectively shortens the RTW-duration after arthroplasty. Success depends on surgeons prescribing brief sick leaves and referring patients to OHS for work ability assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-026-06312-5
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coordinated Return-to-Work model reduces sickness absences after hip or knee arthroplasty: a registry-based study

Pauliina Kangas, Marja-Liisa Kinnunen, Maria Hirvonen, Satu Soini et al.
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Coordinated Return-to-Work model reduces sickness absences after hip or knee arthroplasty: a registry-based study

Pauliina Kangas, Marja-Liisa Kinnunen, Maria Hirvonen, Satu Soini, Konsta Pamilo, Visa Kervinen
article en

Abstract

Working-age adults increasingly undergo total hip (THA) and knee (KA) arthroplasties. We evaluated how post-arthroplasty referral to occupational health services (OHS) using the Coordinated Return-to-Work (CRTW) model, affects return to work (RTW). The CRTW model was evaluated through a benchmarking controlled trial. We used the electronic records of four hospitals in Finland to identify working-age THA and total/unicondylar KA patients before (control group, N = 668) and after (intervention group, N = 536) the CRTW model was implemented. We combined these data with sickness benefits registry data. The differences between the study groups’ RTW were analyzed using a Cox regression model, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, number of special reimbursement entitlements for medicines, and earnings as covariates. Subgroup analyses included intervention participants whose sick leaves were prescribed by a surgeon according to the CRTW protocol. After THA, the control group’s mean RTW-duration was 87.8 days, compared to 74.9 days for the intervention group, with the mean difference being 12.9 days (95% CI 5.7–20.2). The intervention group was associated with earlier RTW; HR 1.35 (95% CI 1.13–1.61). After KA, the control group’s mean RTW-duration was 107.8 days, while the intervention group’s was 93.4 days, with the mean difference being 14.4 days (95% CI 5.9–22.9), HR 1.29 (95% CI 1.09–1.54). In the subgroup analyses, the mean RTW-duration in the specifically targeted intervention groups was 60.2 days after THA and 84.7 days after KA. The mean differences compared with the control groups were 27.6 days (95% CI 19.1–36.1), HR 2.96 (95% CI 2.22–3.95) and 23.1 days (95% CI 10.9–35.3), HR 1.51 (95% CI 1.18–1.95), respectively. The CRTW model effectively shortens the RTW-duration after arthroplasty. Success depends on surgeons prescribing brief sick leaves and referring patients to OHS for work ability assessment.

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgeryVol. 146(1)
University of Eastern Finland (FI), Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FI), Central Finland Health Care District (FI), Etelä-Karjalan sosiaali ja terveyspiiri (FI), University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.