Artificial Intelligence in Trauma Care: A Systematic Review of Resuscitation, Diagnosis, Risk Prediction, and Management

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being explored in trauma care as a tool to support clinical decision-making. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate current evidence on AI applications in trauma resuscitation, diagnosis, complication prediction, and patient management. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane databases to identify studies published between 2015 and 2025. After screening 2968 records, 58 studies met inclusion criteria and were analyzed using a narrative synthesis approach. RESULTS: AI models were applied to trauma resuscitation (n = 8), diagnosis (n = 18), complication prediction (n = 23), and patient management (n = 9). Machine learning and deep learning approaches demonstrated performance comparable with, or exceeding, traditional clinical tools in some studies, including tasks such as predicting massive transfusion, detecting intracranial hemorrhage, forecasting mortality, and supporting intensive care unit or discharge planning. Interpretation of these findings is limited by the predominance of single-center, retrospective study designs and the frequent absence of external validation. CONCLUSIONS: AI shows meaningful potential to support clinical decision-making across multiple stages of trauma care, particularly in time-sensitive, high-risk settings. At present, the evidence base primarily reflects early-phase model development rather than clinical implementation. Future research should prioritize prospective, multicenter studies with external validation and evaluation of real-world clinical impact to determine whether AI-assisted decision support can improve patient-centered outcomes and safely integrate into trauma care workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Trauma Nursing
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/jtn.0000000000000920
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence in Trauma Care: A Systematic Review of Resuscitation, Diagnosis, Risk Prediction, and Management

Adel Elkbuli, Ruth Zagales, Alexander Brown, Ian Bundschu et al.
Journal of Trauma Nursing
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
article

Artificial Intelligence in Trauma Care: A Systematic Review of Resuscitation, Diagnosis, Risk Prediction, and Management

Adel Elkbuli, Ruth Zagales, Alexander Brown, Ian Bundschu, Alexandra Kata, Youssef Nasef, Cameron Nishida, Logan Samuel Rogers, Sukriti Prashar
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being explored in trauma care as a tool to support clinical decision-making. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate current evidence on AI applications in trauma resuscitation, diagnosis, complication prediction, and patient management. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane databases to identify studies published between 2015 and 2025. After screening 2968 records, 58 studies met inclusion criteria and were analyzed using a narrative synthesis approach. RESULTS: AI models were applied to trauma resuscitation (n = 8), diagnosis (n = 18), complication prediction (n = 23), and patient management (n = 9). Machine learning and deep learning approaches demonstrated performance comparable with, or exceeding, traditional clinical tools in some studies, including tasks such as predicting massive transfusion, detecting intracranial hemorrhage, forecasting mortality, and supporting intensive care unit or discharge planning. Interpretation of these findings is limited by the predominance of single-center, retrospective study designs and the frequent absence of external validation. CONCLUSIONS: AI shows meaningful potential to support clinical decision-making across multiple stages of trauma care, particularly in time-sensitive, high-risk settings. At present, the evidence base primarily reflects early-phase model development rather than clinical implementation. Future research should prioritize prospective, multicenter studies with external validation and evaluation of real-world clinical impact to determine whether AI-assisted decision support can improve patient-centered outcomes and safely integrate into trauma care workflows.

Journal of Trauma NursingVol. 33(3)
Nova Southeastern University (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.