Future climate impacts on carbon sequestration dynamics across urban ecosystem types in Finnish cities

Urban ecosystems have the potential to provide carbon (C) sequestration; however, the specifics of urban C sequestration and its behaviour under future climate change are poorly quantified. Here, we explore the C sequestration behaviour of five urban ecosystem types (lawn, mesic meadow, dry meadow, park and forest) and two irrigated types (irrigated park and lawn) in Finnish cities under climate change. Our focus was on the role of meteorological drivers and we wanted to understand how weather conditions influence regional differences in the C sequestration of the urban ecosystem types. We utilized the JSBACH model forced with simulated meteorological data between 2006 and 2100 from the CORDEX initiative, downscaled data from the CanESM2, MIROC5 and CNRM-CM5 climate models. The findings indicate that, overall, urban ecosystems with trees exhibit a higher net ecosystem production (NEP) and demonstrate more stable C sequestration in the face of future climate change. In contrast, different grassland systems are smaller C sinks and can become C sources under different climate projections. Irrigated versions of park and lawn had lower C sequestration than their non-irrigated counterparts through the simulation period. We found that changes in annual precipitation and incoming radiation were the predominant climatic drivers of NEP, while changes in temperature had a mixed or weak effect. These findings highlight the importance of long-term planning, management of urban ecosystems, and understanding of the trade-offs between various ecosystem types and services associated with these urban green spaces in future climates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Ecosystems
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-026-01974-w
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Future climate impacts on carbon sequestration dynamics across urban ecosystem types in Finnish cities

Leena Järvi, Leif Backman, Esko Karvinen, Liisa Kulmala et al.
Urban Ecosystems
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Future climate impacts on carbon sequestration dynamics across urban ecosystem types in Finnish cities

Leena Järvi, Leif Backman, Esko Karvinen, Liisa Kulmala, Aarni Koiso-Kanttila
article en

Abstract

Urban ecosystems have the potential to provide carbon (C) sequestration; however, the specifics of urban C sequestration and its behaviour under future climate change are poorly quantified. Here, we explore the C sequestration behaviour of five urban ecosystem types (lawn, mesic meadow, dry meadow, park and forest) and two irrigated types (irrigated park and lawn) in Finnish cities under climate change. Our focus was on the role of meteorological drivers and we wanted to understand how weather conditions influence regional differences in the C sequestration of the urban ecosystem types. We utilized the JSBACH model forced with simulated meteorological data between 2006 and 2100 from the CORDEX initiative, downscaled data from the CanESM2, MIROC5 and CNRM-CM5 climate models. The findings indicate that, overall, urban ecosystems with trees exhibit a higher net ecosystem production (NEP) and demonstrate more stable C sequestration in the face of future climate change. In contrast, different grassland systems are smaller C sinks and can become C sources under different climate projections. Irrigated versions of park and lawn had lower C sequestration than their non-irrigated counterparts through the simulation period. We found that changes in annual precipitation and incoming radiation were the predominant climatic drivers of NEP, while changes in temperature had a mixed or weak effect. These findings highlight the importance of long-term planning, management of urban ecosystems, and understanding of the trade-offs between various ecosystem types and services associated with these urban green spaces in future climates.

Urban EcosystemsVol. 29(3)
Finnish Meteorological Institute (FI), University of Helsinki (FI)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.