Analysis of interactions between crossing cyclists at intersections based on trajectory data

Cyclists have the option of crossing at various streets and intersections, with or without traffic lights, and with or without a bicycle path.Frequently, the traffic regulations pertaining to cross on vehicle lanes are clearly stipulated for cyclists as well.However, in Germany, the situation regarding bicycle paths is often more complex.In Germany, a total of 32% (n = 1565) of all bicycle-bicycle accidents in 2023 (n = 4867) were accidents involving injuries when cyclists crossed paths, resulting in 3 deaths [7].Due to the paucity of research on intersection behaviour, it is imperative to ascertain how cyclists behave when crossing on a daily basis and whether critical interactions frequently occur.This publication presents the research methodology and descriptive results of two traffic observations and a related survey.One observation was conducted at a signalised urban intersection with separated bicycle and footpaths, and the other one at a non-signalled intersection without a separated bicycle path.Both locations are in Braunschweig, Germany.At these intersections, the trajectories of road users were recorded by using camera systems and subsequently analysed with the aim of identifying interactions between crossing cyclists.It appeared that there was direct crossing of the path or a merging of the two bicycle paths.At the main measurement location, a total of 171 h of video data were analysed.Of these, 120 interactions were recorded at a PET ranging from -3 to 3 s.A low PET is often considered a safety critical indicator of an interaction.2.2% of interactions occurred at a PET between -1 and 1 s, suggesting an elevated possibility for conflict.The results indicate that, irrespective of the presence of traffic lights on the bicycle path or the absence thereof, approximately only 50% of cyclists yield to other cyclists, which have the right-of-way.A survey conducted as part of this study revealed that many cyclists are unaware of the rules that govern their use of bicycle paths.A second measurement location without a bicycle path also shows that around 50% of cyclists give way.Due to the width of the road, distances and PET values are greater, but speeds are also higher.The study highlights the serious potential for cyclist conflicts at intersections and the need to develop mitigating measures like education.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
IATSS Research
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2026.02.002
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of interactions between crossing cyclists at intersections based on trajectory data

Kay Gimm, Claudia Leschik
IATSS Research
Traffic and Road Safety
article

Analysis of interactions between crossing cyclists at intersections based on trajectory data

Kay Gimm, Claudia Leschik
article en

Abstract

Cyclists have the option of crossing at various streets and intersections, with or without traffic lights, and with or without a bicycle path.Frequently, the traffic regulations pertaining to cross on vehicle lanes are clearly stipulated for cyclists as well.However, in Germany, the situation regarding bicycle paths is often more complex.In Germany, a total of 32% (n = 1565) of all bicycle-bicycle accidents in 2023 (n = 4867) were accidents involving injuries when cyclists crossed paths, resulting in 3 deaths [7].Due to the paucity of research on intersection behaviour, it is imperative to ascertain how cyclists behave when crossing on a daily basis and whether critical interactions frequently occur.This publication presents the research methodology and descriptive results of two traffic observations and a related survey.One observation was conducted at a signalised urban intersection with separated bicycle and footpaths, and the other one at a non-signalled intersection without a separated bicycle path.Both locations are in Braunschweig, Germany.At these intersections, the trajectories of road users were recorded by using camera systems and subsequently analysed with the aim of identifying interactions between crossing cyclists.It appeared that there was direct crossing of the path or a merging of the two bicycle paths.At the main measurement location, a total of 171 h of video data were analysed.Of these, 120 interactions were recorded at a PET ranging from -3 to 3 s.A low PET is often considered a safety critical indicator of an interaction.2.2% of interactions occurred at a PET between -1 and 1 s, suggesting an elevated possibility for conflict.The results indicate that, irrespective of the presence of traffic lights on the bicycle path or the absence thereof, approximately only 50% of cyclists yield to other cyclists, which have the right-of-way.A survey conducted as part of this study revealed that many cyclists are unaware of the rules that govern their use of bicycle paths.A second measurement location without a bicycle path also shows that around 50% of cyclists give way.Due to the width of the road, distances and PET values are greater, but speeds are also higher.The study highlights the serious potential for cyclist conflicts at intersections and the need to develop mitigating measures like education.

IATSS ResearchVol. 50(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.