Normative scores and clinical cut‐offs of the Cyclothymic–Hypersensitive Temperament Questionnaire in adolescence

Abstract Background The Cyclothymic–Hypersensitive Temperament (CHT) is a multidimensional, transdiagnostic affective disposition characterized by mood instability, interpersonal sensitivity, heightened emotional reactivity and impulsive behaviors. The CHT Questionnaire (CHTQ) currently lacks of normative references and empirically derived thresholds. Methods Study 1 established age‐ and sex‐adjusted normative scores and derived percentiles, tolerance limits, and Equivalent Score (ES)–based risk categories. Study 2 tested the clinical relevance of these norms in 196 adolescents with bipolar spectrum disorders and propensity score–matched controls, examining group differences, ES‐based risk distributions, and disorder‐specific thresholds. Results In Study 1, regression analyses showed a significant age‐by‐sex interaction for Total and subscale scores. Age was positively associated with Total in females ( R 2 = 0.029) and negatively in males ( R 2 = 0.009). The same pattern emerged for Impulsiveness/Emotional Dysregulation (IED; females: R 2 = 0.029; males: ns) and Moodiness/Hypersensitivity (MHS; R 2 = 0.017 both sexes), supporting age‐ and sex‐specific norms. Normative values and ES‐based classifications enhanced score interpretability. Moderate‐ and high‐risk thresholds were 15.32 and 17.24 for Total, 6.67 and 7.70 for IED, 9.80 and 10.87 for MHS. In Study 2, bipolar adolescents showed higher adjusted Total and IED than controls (Total: t = −3.33, p < 0.001, d = 0.34; IED: t = −4.42, p < 0.001, d = 0.45), with no MHS differences. Logistic regression showed Total (odds ratio [OR] = 1.08, p = 0.001) and IED (OR = 1.20, p < 0.001), but not MHS, predicted bipolar status. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses showed modest discrimination for Total (Area Under the Curve [AUC] = 0.61; cut‐off = 13.50) and IED (AUC = 0.63; cut‐off = 4.78), and chance‐level performance for MHS. Conclusion Integrating age‐ and sex‐adjusted norms with risk categories and clinical thresholds, the CHTQ may support developmentally informed early risk stratification and longitudinal monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCPP Advances
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.70126
Primary Topic
Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Normative scores and clinical cut‐offs of the Cyclothymic–Hypersensitive Temperament Questionnaire in adolescence

Vincenzo Paolo Senese, Carmela Bravaccio, Simone Pisano, Anna Pezzella et al.
JCPP Advances
Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
article

Normative scores and clinical cut‐offs of the Cyclothymic–Hypersensitive Temperament Questionnaire in adolescence

Vincenzo Paolo Senese, Carmela Bravaccio, Simone Pisano, Anna Pezzella, Gianluca Sesso, Gennaro Catone, Annarita Milone, Raffaella Iuliano, Giulia Mutti, Gabriele Masi, Pietro Buono
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The Cyclothymic–Hypersensitive Temperament (CHT) is a multidimensional, transdiagnostic affective disposition characterized by mood instability, interpersonal sensitivity, heightened emotional reactivity and impulsive behaviors. The CHT Questionnaire (CHTQ) currently lacks of normative references and empirically derived thresholds. Methods Study 1 established age‐ and sex‐adjusted normative scores and derived percentiles, tolerance limits, and Equivalent Score (ES)–based risk categories. Study 2 tested the clinical relevance of these norms in 196 adolescents with bipolar spectrum disorders and propensity score–matched controls, examining group differences, ES‐based risk distributions, and disorder‐specific thresholds. Results In Study 1, regression analyses showed a significant age‐by‐sex interaction for Total and subscale scores. Age was positively associated with Total in females ( R 2 = 0.029) and negatively in males ( R 2 = 0.009). The same pattern emerged for Impulsiveness/Emotional Dysregulation (IED; females: R 2 = 0.029; males: ns) and Moodiness/Hypersensitivity (MHS; R 2 = 0.017 both sexes), supporting age‐ and sex‐specific norms. Normative values and ES‐based classifications enhanced score interpretability. Moderate‐ and high‐risk thresholds were 15.32 and 17.24 for Total, 6.67 and 7.70 for IED, 9.80 and 10.87 for MHS. In Study 2, bipolar adolescents showed higher adjusted Total and IED than controls (Total: t = −3.33, p < 0.001, d = 0.34; IED: t = −4.42, p < 0.001, d = 0.45), with no MHS differences. Logistic regression showed Total (odds ratio [OR] = 1.08, p = 0.001) and IED (OR = 1.20, p < 0.001), but not MHS, predicted bipolar status. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses showed modest discrimination for Total (Area Under the Curve [AUC] = 0.61; cut‐off = 13.50) and IED (AUC = 0.63; cut‐off = 4.78), and chance‐level performance for MHS. Conclusion Integrating age‐ and sex‐adjusted norms with risk categories and clinical thresholds, the CHTQ may support developmentally informed early risk stratification and longitudinal monitoring.

JCPP Advances
IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca (IT), University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT), Regione Campania (IT), Università degli Studi Suor Orsola Benincasa (IT), Directorate of Health (IS), Federico II University Hospital (IT), Fondazione Stella Maris (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.