Bacteremia prediction models to reduce unnecessary blood cultures: external validation in a large US emergency department

Bacteremia prediction models can avoid unnecessary blood cultures while missing few bacteremia patients in European cohorts. We aimed to assess the performance of these models in the United States. We externally validated five prediction models in patients ≥ 18 years old evaluated in an academic emergency department (ED) in the United States, between October 2013 and October 2023. Patients needed to have one or more blood cultures and a procalcitonin (PCT) test within 6 h of obtaining blood cultures. The models used basic clinical information such as age and vital signs, with or without the addition of C-reactive protein (CRP), PCT or both. Missing data were imputed. The outcome of the models was bacteremia, defined as at least one true positive blood culture obtained within 48 h of the ED visit. Performance of the models was assessed with the C-statistic for discrimination and calibration plots for calibration. Clinical usefulness was evaluated by the potential reduction in blood cultures, missed bacteremic episodes and decision curve analysis. We included 12,864 patients (55% male, median age 66 years). 1164 out of 12,864 (9.0%) had bacteremia, while 843 (6.6%) patients had contaminated blood cultures. We observed substantial improvement in performance for models that included PCT, compared to those based on clinical information alone or with CRP. The best performing models included PCT with or without clinical information, with C-statistics of 0.80 (95% CI 0.79-0.82 and 0.79-0.81), adequate overall calibration (predicted 10.4%-13.0%, observed 9.0%). Both models were able to reduce ̴30% of blood cultures while missing 5% of bacteremic episodes. We conclude that previously proposed bacteremia prediction models demonstrated robust applicability in a large United States ED population. Models including procalcitonin have promise to safely avoid many blood cultures in the ED. Further validation and impact studies may support the implementation of these models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47024-5
Primary Topic
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bacteremia prediction models to reduce unnecessary blood cultures: external validation in a large US emergency department

Laraine Washer, Anna Kaal, Cees van Nieuwkoop, Prashant Mahajan et al.
Scientific Reports
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
article

Bacteremia prediction models to reduce unnecessary blood cultures: external validation in a large US emergency department

Laraine Washer, Anna Kaal, Cees van Nieuwkoop, Prashant Mahajan, Ewout Steyerberg, Anastasia Wasylyshyn
article en

Abstract

Bacteremia prediction models can avoid unnecessary blood cultures while missing few bacteremia patients in European cohorts. We aimed to assess the performance of these models in the United States. We externally validated five prediction models in patients ≥ 18 years old evaluated in an academic emergency department (ED) in the United States, between October 2013 and October 2023. Patients needed to have one or more blood cultures and a procalcitonin (PCT) test within 6 h of obtaining blood cultures. The models used basic clinical information such as age and vital signs, with or without the addition of C-reactive protein (CRP), PCT or both. Missing data were imputed. The outcome of the models was bacteremia, defined as at least one true positive blood culture obtained within 48 h of the ED visit. Performance of the models was assessed with the C-statistic for discrimination and calibration plots for calibration. Clinical usefulness was evaluated by the potential reduction in blood cultures, missed bacteremic episodes and decision curve analysis. We included 12,864 patients (55% male, median age 66 years). 1164 out of 12,864 (9.0%) had bacteremia, while 843 (6.6%) patients had contaminated blood cultures. We observed substantial improvement in performance for models that included PCT, compared to those based on clinical information alone or with CRP. The best performing models included PCT with or without clinical information, with C-statistics of 0.80 (95% CI 0.79-0.82 and 0.79-0.81), adequate overall calibration (predicted 10.4%-13.0%, observed 9.0%). Both models were able to reduce ̴30% of blood cultures while missing 5% of bacteremic episodes. We conclude that previously proposed bacteremia prediction models demonstrated robust applicability in a large United States ED population. Models including procalcitonin have promise to safely avoid many blood cultures in the ED. Further validation and impact studies may support the implementation of these models.

Scientific Reports
University of Michigan (US), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Michigan Medicine (US), Haga Hospital (NL)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.