Governing Evidence in Contentious Times: A GUARD Framework for Public Health Leadership

Public health leadership faces widening inequities, uneven life expectancy trends, and growing information disorder. Experience from COVID-19 showed that shortcomings often stem less from lack of evidence than from weaknesses in how evidence inform decisions. This commentary reframes the challenge as one of evidence governance: ensuring that knowledge is interpreted, debated, and translated into fair, accountable action. We introduce GUARD, a practice-oriented framework for governing evidence: Govern in public, User power-sharing, Architect and audit integrity, Resist manipulation of meaning, and Demonstrate legitimacy. Rather than proposing new principles, GUARD operationalizes existing ones into implementable governance routines, offering public health leaders a practical pathway to strengthen legitimacy, reduce inequities, and sustain trustworthiness under uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public health reviews
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2026.1609645
Primary Topic
Public Health Policies and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governing Evidence in Contentious Times: A GUARD Framework for Public Health Leadership

Yves Martin‐Prével, Roch Giorgi, Geneviève Chêne, Marie Préau et al.
Public health reviews
Public Health Policies and Education
article

Governing Evidence in Contentious Times: A GUARD Framework for Public Health Leadership

Yves Martin‐Prével, Roch Giorgi, Geneviève Chêne, Marie Préau, Paulette Lenert
article en

Abstract

Public health leadership faces widening inequities, uneven life expectancy trends, and growing information disorder. Experience from COVID-19 showed that shortcomings often stem less from lack of evidence than from weaknesses in how evidence inform decisions. This commentary reframes the challenge as one of evidence governance: ensuring that knowledge is interpreted, debated, and translated into fair, accountable action. We introduce GUARD, a practice-oriented framework for governing evidence: Govern in public, User power-sharing, Architect and audit integrity, Resist manipulation of meaning, and Demonstrate legitimacy. Rather than proposing new principles, GUARD operationalizes existing ones into implementable governance routines, offering public health leaders a practical pathway to strengthen legitimacy, reduce inequities, and sustain trustworthiness under uncertainty.

Public health reviewsVol. 47
Université de Bordeaux (FR), Inserm (FR), Université Lumière Lyon 2 (FR), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Chamber of Deputies (IT), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (FR), Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (CG), Montpellier Interdisciplinary center on Sustainable Agri-food systems: social and nutritional sciences (FR), Economic & Social Sciences, Health Systems & Medical Informatics (FR), Centre Émile Durkheim (FR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Public Health Policies and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.