Evaluation of classical and deep-learning deformable registration for magnetic resonance to four-dimensional computed tomography contour mapping in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy

Background and purpose: : In liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-to-four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) contour mapping remains challenging because of cross-modality differences and respiratory motion, motivating fast automated solutions. We comparatively evaluated the clinical practicality of deep learning (DL) based deformable image registration (DIR). Materials and Methods: : This retrospective study included 4D-CT and 3D MRI scans from 170 patients treated with liver SBRT. Segmentations were obtained using open-source automated tools, and test-set labels were clinician reviewed. The dataset was split at the patient level into training/validation/testing sets (122/32/16), an additional 5-fold cross-validation was performed on the training+validation cohort. We compared three approaches: an optimization-based B-spline DIR tool (NiftyReg), a single-network DL model (Direct), and a two-step DL pipeline decomposing multi-modal alignment and intra-4D-CT motion tracking. Statistical analysis used patient-level paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests; organ-wise secondary analyses were corrected using the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR; q=0.05). Results: 59 s to 0.09 s per registration. The two-step pipeline improved deformation regularity (foldings 0.009% vs 0.025% for Direct). Conclusion: DL pipelines provided competitive contour-mapping accuracy with orders-of-magnitude runtime gains, but performance depended strongly on the choice of training supervision; classical DIR remained strongest on global all-label metrics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2026.100969
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of classical and deep-learning deformable registration for magnetic resonance to four-dimensional computed tomography contour mapping in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy

Soleakhena Ken, Elizabeth Cohen‐Jonathan Moyal, Laurent Risser, Ziad Kheil
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Evaluation of classical and deep-learning deformable registration for magnetic resonance to four-dimensional computed tomography contour mapping in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy

Soleakhena Ken, Elizabeth Cohen‐Jonathan Moyal, Laurent Risser, Ziad Kheil
article en

Abstract

Background and purpose: : In liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-to-four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) contour mapping remains challenging because of cross-modality differences and respiratory motion, motivating fast automated solutions. We comparatively evaluated the clinical practicality of deep learning (DL) based deformable image registration (DIR). Materials and Methods: : This retrospective study included 4D-CT and 3D MRI scans from 170 patients treated with liver SBRT. Segmentations were obtained using open-source automated tools, and test-set labels were clinician reviewed. The dataset was split at the patient level into training/validation/testing sets (122/32/16), an additional 5-fold cross-validation was performed on the training+validation cohort. We compared three approaches: an optimization-based B-spline DIR tool (NiftyReg), a single-network DL model (Direct), and a two-step DL pipeline decomposing multi-modal alignment and intra-4D-CT motion tracking. Statistical analysis used patient-level paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests; organ-wise secondary analyses were corrected using the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR; q=0.05). Results: 59 s to 0.09 s per registration. The two-step pipeline improved deformation regularity (foldings 0.009% vs 0.025% for Direct). Conclusion: DL pipelines provided competitive contour-mapping accuracy with orders-of-magnitude runtime gains, but performance depended strongly on the choice of training supervision; classical DIR remained strongest on global all-label metrics.

Physics and Imaging in Radiation OncologyVol. 39
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR), Inserm (FR), Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole (FR), Toulouse Mathematics Institute (FR), Institut Claudius Regaud (FR)
Ministère de l'Enseignement supérieur, de la Recherche et de l'Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.