Mpox Clinical Outcomes in People With and Without HIV Treated With Tecovirimat: A Systematic Review

Mpox poses heightened risks for immunocompromised individuals, particularly people with HIV (PWH), yet evidence on clinical outcomes and antiviral treatment remains limited. We conducted a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, searching MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from inception through October 2025. Fourteen studies comprising 8867 patients were included. A recently published randomized controlled trial evaluating tecovirimat for mpox was also considered to contextualise the findings. Owing to substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity, data were synthesised narratively using the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) framework. Across studies, mpox severity followed a clear CD4-dependent gradient. People without HIV (PWoH) and PWH with relatively preserved immune function (generally CD4 ≥ 200 cells/μL) typically experienced milder, self-limiting disease, with treatment failure rates below 5%. In contrast, PWH with CD4 counts < 200 cells/μL, particularly those < 100 cells/μL, demonstrated substantially higher rates of necrotic lesions, proctitis, hospitalisation, delayed viral clearance, and mortality. Treatment failure in this subgroup ranged from 15% to 30%, and all confirmed cases of tecovirimat resistance (3 of 18 tested) occurred in patients with CD4 counts < 100 cells/μL. Observational studies suggested that earlier initiation of tecovirimat (≤ 7 days from symptom onset) was associated with more favourable clinical trajectories. However, randomised controlled trial evidence has not demonstrated a clear efficacy signal, and prolonged treatment courses (21-28 days) were frequently required in patients with advanced HIV, reflecting persistent disease rather than established antiviral benefit. Tecovirimat was generally well tolerated, with mild adverse events reported in approximately 20%-25% of patients and no serious adverse events definitively attributed to therapy across the included studies. Overall, immunological status rather than HIV serostatus alone appeared to be the principal determinant of mpox severity and clinical outcomes, underscoring the importance of CD4-guided management strategies and targeted resistance surveillance in immunocompromised populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reviews in Medical Virology
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.70152
Primary Topic
Poxvirus research and outbreaks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mpox Clinical Outcomes in People With and Without HIV Treated With Tecovirimat: A Systematic Review

Santenna Chenchula, Krishna Chaitanya Amerneni, Satya Prakash, Mohan Krishna Ghanta et al.
Reviews in Medical Virology
Poxvirus research and outbreaks
article

Mpox Clinical Outcomes in People With and Without HIV Treated With Tecovirimat: A Systematic Review

Santenna Chenchula, Krishna Chaitanya Amerneni, Satya Prakash, Mohan Krishna Ghanta, Padmavathi Rajakarunakaran, Anitha Kuttiappan, Sunil Kumar Gupta, Madhavrao Chavan, Sri Varshini Talagampala
article en

Abstract

Mpox poses heightened risks for immunocompromised individuals, particularly people with HIV (PWH), yet evidence on clinical outcomes and antiviral treatment remains limited. We conducted a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, searching MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from inception through October 2025. Fourteen studies comprising 8867 patients were included. A recently published randomized controlled trial evaluating tecovirimat for mpox was also considered to contextualise the findings. Owing to substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity, data were synthesised narratively using the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) framework. Across studies, mpox severity followed a clear CD4-dependent gradient. People without HIV (PWoH) and PWH with relatively preserved immune function (generally CD4 ≥ 200 cells/μL) typically experienced milder, self-limiting disease, with treatment failure rates below 5%. In contrast, PWH with CD4 counts < 200 cells/μL, particularly those < 100 cells/μL, demonstrated substantially higher rates of necrotic lesions, proctitis, hospitalisation, delayed viral clearance, and mortality. Treatment failure in this subgroup ranged from 15% to 30%, and all confirmed cases of tecovirimat resistance (3 of 18 tested) occurred in patients with CD4 counts < 100 cells/μL. Observational studies suggested that earlier initiation of tecovirimat (≤ 7 days from symptom onset) was associated with more favourable clinical trajectories. However, randomised controlled trial evidence has not demonstrated a clear efficacy signal, and prolonged treatment courses (21-28 days) were frequently required in patients with advanced HIV, reflecting persistent disease rather than established antiviral benefit. Tecovirimat was generally well tolerated, with mild adverse events reported in approximately 20%-25% of patients and no serious adverse events definitively attributed to therapy across the included studies. Overall, immunological status rather than HIV serostatus alone appeared to be the principal determinant of mpox severity and clinical outcomes, underscoring the importance of CD4-guided management strategies and targeted resistance surveillance in immunocompromised populations.

Reviews in Medical VirologyVol. 36(3)
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur (IN), University of Arizona (US), Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies (IN), Sarojini Naidu Medical College (IN), College of Medical Sciences (NP), Mediciti Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal (IN), MVJ Medical College and Research Hospital (IN), Gandhi Medical College (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Poxvirus research and outbreaks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.