A Quantitative Evaluation of the PowerRef 3 for Measuring Gaze Position

PURPOSE: To evaluate the quality of gaze position measurements from the PowerRef 3 photorefractor and assess the impact of gaze position on the PowerRef 3 refractive measurements. METHODS: Monocular right-eye gaze was recorded in 20 adults (16 female, 4 male; 25.0±7.4 years) using the PowerRef 3 photorefractor (50 Hz). Participants fixated a target at 120 cm in 39 randomised locations (±24° horizontally [h], ±14° vertically [v]; 2° steps from centre). At each location, spatial accuracy, precision (root mean square of distances between samples and mean fixation [RMS-mean] and between successive samples [RMS-S2S]) and data loss were assessed. The impact of gaze position on refractive measurements was also examined. Gaze position data were also recorded using the EyeLink 1000 (500 Hz) to provide reference quality metrics. RESULTS: The PowerRef 3 had spatial accuracy of h = 1.45° ± 0.41° and v = 1.29° ± 0.15° and variable precision (RMS-Mean: h = 1.37° ± 0.12°, v = 1.32° ± 0.11°; RMS-S2S: h = 1.96° ± 0.16°, v = 1.90° ± 0.18°). Reference metrics obtained using the EyeLink showed slightly higher accuracy and precision (accuracy: h = 0.53° ± 0.09°, v = 0.52° ± 0.09°; RMS-Mean: h = 0.17° ± 0.02°, v = 0.19° ± 0.03°; RMS-S2S: h = 0.08° ± 0.01°, v = 0.07° ± 0.01°). Notable data loss for the PowerRef 3 was primarily observed at eccentric horizontal locations (0°-±16°: ≤30% of participants; ±20°-±24°: 35-70%; EyeLink 0°-±24°: ≤5%). PowerRef 3 data loss was also greater for lower vertical targets (≥30%) than for higher ones (≤20%). Relative to the pupillary axis, refractive measurements were more hyperopic beyond +10° horizontally (rightward gaze; 0.36-0.62 D) and beyond -6° vertically (downward; 0.59-1.44 D) and more myopic (≤1.29 D) between -10° to -18° horizontally (leftward). CONCLUSION: The PowerRef 3 can record gaze positions within ±8° horizontally and -4° (downward) to +10° (upward) vertically without a significant impact on both gaze and refractive measurements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44402-026-00084-6
Primary Topic
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Quantitative Evaluation of the PowerRef 3 for Measuring Gaze Position

Jennifer X. Haensel, Kristin E. Slinger, Tawna L. Roberts, Tyler J. Vandiver et al.
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
article

A Quantitative Evaluation of the PowerRef 3 for Measuring Gaze Position

Jennifer X. Haensel, Kristin E. Slinger, Tawna L. Roberts, Tyler J. Vandiver, Christabel A. Ameyaw Baah, Amber Hu, Georgia Hutchinson
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the quality of gaze position measurements from the PowerRef 3 photorefractor and assess the impact of gaze position on the PowerRef 3 refractive measurements. METHODS: Monocular right-eye gaze was recorded in 20 adults (16 female, 4 male; 25.0±7.4 years) using the PowerRef 3 photorefractor (50 Hz). Participants fixated a target at 120 cm in 39 randomised locations (±24° horizontally [h], ±14° vertically [v]; 2° steps from centre). At each location, spatial accuracy, precision (root mean square of distances between samples and mean fixation [RMS-mean] and between successive samples [RMS-S2S]) and data loss were assessed. The impact of gaze position on refractive measurements was also examined. Gaze position data were also recorded using the EyeLink 1000 (500 Hz) to provide reference quality metrics. RESULTS: The PowerRef 3 had spatial accuracy of h = 1.45° ± 0.41° and v = 1.29° ± 0.15° and variable precision (RMS-Mean: h = 1.37° ± 0.12°, v = 1.32° ± 0.11°; RMS-S2S: h = 1.96° ± 0.16°, v = 1.90° ± 0.18°). Reference metrics obtained using the EyeLink showed slightly higher accuracy and precision (accuracy: h = 0.53° ± 0.09°, v = 0.52° ± 0.09°; RMS-Mean: h = 0.17° ± 0.02°, v = 0.19° ± 0.03°; RMS-S2S: h = 0.08° ± 0.01°, v = 0.07° ± 0.01°). Notable data loss for the PowerRef 3 was primarily observed at eccentric horizontal locations (0°-±16°: ≤30% of participants; ±20°-±24°: 35-70%; EyeLink 0°-±24°: ≤5%). PowerRef 3 data loss was also greater for lower vertical targets (≥30%) than for higher ones (≤20%). Relative to the pupillary axis, refractive measurements were more hyperopic beyond +10° horizontally (rightward gaze; 0.36-0.62 D) and beyond -6° vertically (downward; 0.59-1.44 D) and more myopic (≤1.29 D) between -10° to -18° horizontally (leftward). CONCLUSION: The PowerRef 3 can record gaze positions within ±8° horizontally and -4° (downward) to +10° (upward) vertically without a significant impact on both gaze and refractive measurements.

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute (US), Stanford University (US)
U.S. Department of Defense, Research to Prevent Blindness, Eli Lilly and Company, National Institutes of Health, National Eye Institute, Stanford Maternal and Child Health Research Institute
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.