Tropical insect biodiversity loss from forest-pasture conversion is substantially underestimated across spatial scales

Understanding how biodiversity responds to forest conversion across spatial scales is essential for designing effective conservation and monitoring strategies. Using abundance-based models at a spatial resolution of 2 × 2 km, we analyzed 243 dung beetle species sampled across 865 sites within 13 Colombian ecoregions and found that biodiversity loss is substantially amplified at broader spatial scales under simulated scenarios. Biodiversity loss, measured as the proportion of species negatively affected by conversion, increased by 25% at a near-national scale compared with local-scale assessments, while the abundance ratio of the median-sensitivity species declined by 42%, revealing pronounced erosion that remains hidden at local scales. Estimates based on a single ecoregion underestimated biodiversity loss by a factor of 1.65, with at least five to six ecoregions required for estimates to converge toward near-national patterns. These results show that reliance on limited spatial coverage can obscure the magnitude of biodiversity erosion in heterogeneous tropical systems, pointing to the need for broad, regionally representative sampling to generate reliable biodiversity indicators and inform conservation decision-making. Local management decisions must therefore be interpreted within a regional context, as sites showing weak or no local declines may still contribute substantially to broader-scale biodiversity loss.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Biology
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2026.03.056
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tropical insect biodiversity loss from forest-pasture conversion is substantially underestimated across spatial scales

Torbjørn Haugaasen, Jos Barlow, Inge Armbrecht, Jacob B. Socolar et al.
Current Biology
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
article

Tropical insect biodiversity loss from forest-pasture conversion is substantially underestimated across spatial scales

Torbjørn Haugaasen, Jos Barlow, Inge Armbrecht, Jacob B. Socolar, David P. Edwards, Claudia A. Medina Uribe, Felicity A. Edwards, Jose M. Ochoa Quintero, Diego E. Martínez-Revelo, Robert P. Freckleton, James Montoya-Lerma
article en

Abstract

Understanding how biodiversity responds to forest conversion across spatial scales is essential for designing effective conservation and monitoring strategies. Using abundance-based models at a spatial resolution of 2 × 2 km, we analyzed 243 dung beetle species sampled across 865 sites within 13 Colombian ecoregions and found that biodiversity loss is substantially amplified at broader spatial scales under simulated scenarios. Biodiversity loss, measured as the proportion of species negatively affected by conversion, increased by 25% at a near-national scale compared with local-scale assessments, while the abundance ratio of the median-sensitivity species declined by 42%, revealing pronounced erosion that remains hidden at local scales. Estimates based on a single ecoregion underestimated biodiversity loss by a factor of 1.65, with at least five to six ecoregions required for estimates to converge toward near-national patterns. These results show that reliance on limited spatial coverage can obscure the magnitude of biodiversity erosion in heterogeneous tropical systems, pointing to the need for broad, regionally representative sampling to generate reliable biodiversity indicators and inform conservation decision-making. Local management decisions must therefore be interpreted within a regional context, as sites showing weak or no local declines may still contribute substantially to broader-scale biodiversity loss.

Current BiologyVol. 36(9)
University of Cambridge (GB), Alexander von Humboldt Biological Resources Research Institute (CO), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO), Lancaster University (GB), University of Sheffield (GB), Universidad del Valle (CO)
Norges Forskningsråd, Natural Environment Research Council
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.