A bibliometric analysis of algorithmic governance and employee experience in the modern workplace

The diffusion of artificial intelligence in organizations is reshaping how work is allocated, monitored, evaluated, and disciplined through algorithmically mediated management. This article maps the intellectual landscape at the intersection of algorithmic governance, seenn as the rules, oversight mechanisms, and accountability arrangements guiding workplace algorithms, and employee experience, defined as employees’ perceptions of fairness, autonomy, trust, well-being, and recognition. Using a bibliometric analysis of 295 Scopus-indexed peer-reviewed journal articles, the study examines publication trends, influential journals and authors, and the field’s conceptual structure. Analyses were conducted using Biblioshiny and complemented with VOSviewer network visualizations of co-authorship, co-citation, and keyword co-occurrence. Findings show a sharp rise in research output from 2020, with strong concentration since 2022. The field’s conceptual core centers on artificial intelligence, algorithmic management, control, and the gig economy, while employee-experience themes such as autonomy, engagement, job satisfaction, and well-being are becoming more closely linked to governance mechanisms including transparency, contestability, accountability, and human oversight. The literature is evolving from platform-focused studies of control toward broader debates on responsible, human-centered AI, offering useful insights for organizations, HR professionals, and policymakers designing fair and transparent algorithmic workplaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Business & Management
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2026.2655925
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A bibliometric analysis of algorithmic governance and employee experience in the modern workplace

Kévin Sevag Kertechian, Rayane Elidrissi, Hadi El-Farr
Cogent Business & Management
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

A bibliometric analysis of algorithmic governance and employee experience in the modern workplace

Kévin Sevag Kertechian, Rayane Elidrissi, Hadi El-Farr
article en

Abstract

The diffusion of artificial intelligence in organizations is reshaping how work is allocated, monitored, evaluated, and disciplined through algorithmically mediated management. This article maps the intellectual landscape at the intersection of algorithmic governance, seenn as the rules, oversight mechanisms, and accountability arrangements guiding workplace algorithms, and employee experience, defined as employees’ perceptions of fairness, autonomy, trust, well-being, and recognition. Using a bibliometric analysis of 295 Scopus-indexed peer-reviewed journal articles, the study examines publication trends, influential journals and authors, and the field’s conceptual structure. Analyses were conducted using Biblioshiny and complemented with VOSviewer network visualizations of co-authorship, co-citation, and keyword co-occurrence. Findings show a sharp rise in research output from 2020, with strong concentration since 2022. The field’s conceptual core centers on artificial intelligence, algorithmic management, control, and the gig economy, while employee-experience themes such as autonomy, engagement, job satisfaction, and well-being are becoming more closely linked to governance mechanisms including transparency, contestability, accountability, and human oversight. The literature is evolving from platform-focused studies of control toward broader debates on responsible, human-centered AI, offering useful insights for organizations, HR professionals, and policymakers designing fair and transparent algorithmic workplaces.

Cogent Business & ManagementVol. 13(1)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), State University of Management (RU), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR), ESSCA School of Management (FR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.