Biological scarification of <i>Erythrina crista-galli</i> : germination responses, performance costs, and implications for riparian forest restoration

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Restoration of subtropical riparian forests is frequently constrained by limited seedling recruitment in altered environments, particularly in native legumes with physically dormant seeds. In Erythrina crista-galli, insect seed predation may act as biological scarification, potentially facilitating germination, but at the cost of seed viability and performance. This study compared biological scarification caused by insect predation with controlled mechanical scarification to evaluate their effects on germination, seedling establishment, and reserve mobilization. METHODS: Seeds were subjected to four treatments: intact control, biological scarification (insect-predated seeds), and mechanical scarification by scraping or perforation. Seed viability, imbibition, germination dynamics, membrane integrity, seedling growth under controlled and soil conditions, and carbohydrate and protein reserves were quantified. Multivariate analyses were used to integrate germination, growth, and biochemical responses. KEY RESULTS: Predation was largely detrimental: biologically scarified seeds absorbed water fastest but showed high inviability (∼86%), elevated electrical conductivity (membrane leakage), low germination (∼18%), and frequent abnormal seedlings. In contrast, mechanical scarification broke dormancy efficiently, yielding >90% germination, faster synchronization, and greater biomass. In soil, emergence ranked: scraping (77.7%) > perforation (61.1%) > biological (50%) ≈ control (44%). Protein levels remained stable, but carbohydrate dynamics diverged: biological scarification showed lower starch and final sucrose accumulation, contrasting with the consumption and mobilization in mechanical treatments. PCA clustered mechanical scarification with germination and biomass, whereas biological scarification associated with sucrose. CONCLUSIONS: Biological scarification costs outweigh its benefits in E. crista-galli. This study shows that dormancy release in physically dormant seeds is pathway-dependent, with biological scarification facilitating water entry but compromising physiological integrity and seedling performance. By demonstrating that different scarification routes generate distinct metabolic and developmental outcomes, our findings shift the view of dormancy break from a purely structural process to an integrated physiological filter, with implications for plant regeneration and restoration strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Botany
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcag099
Primary Topic
Seed Germination and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biological scarification of Erythrina crista-galli : germination responses, performance costs, and implications for riparian forest restoration

Marcos Antônio Bacarin, Tanise Luisa Sausen, Júnior Borella, Caroline Igansi Duarte et al.
Annals of Botany
Seed Germination and Physiology
article

Biological scarification of Erythrina crista-galli : germination responses, performance costs, and implications for riparian forest restoration

Marcos Antônio Bacarin, Tanise Luisa Sausen, Júnior Borella, Caroline Igansi Duarte, Saimon Branco Bueno, Ana Paula Roschildt, Jean M Freitag Kramer, Daniel Burd Villanova
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Restoration of subtropical riparian forests is frequently constrained by limited seedling recruitment in altered environments, particularly in native legumes with physically dormant seeds. In Erythrina crista-galli, insect seed predation may act as biological scarification, potentially facilitating germination, but at the cost of seed viability and performance. This study compared biological scarification caused by insect predation with controlled mechanical scarification to evaluate their effects on germination, seedling establishment, and reserve mobilization. METHODS: Seeds were subjected to four treatments: intact control, biological scarification (insect-predated seeds), and mechanical scarification by scraping or perforation. Seed viability, imbibition, germination dynamics, membrane integrity, seedling growth under controlled and soil conditions, and carbohydrate and protein reserves were quantified. Multivariate analyses were used to integrate germination, growth, and biochemical responses. KEY RESULTS: Predation was largely detrimental: biologically scarified seeds absorbed water fastest but showed high inviability (∼86%), elevated electrical conductivity (membrane leakage), low germination (∼18%), and frequent abnormal seedlings. In contrast, mechanical scarification broke dormancy efficiently, yielding >90% germination, faster synchronization, and greater biomass. In soil, emergence ranked: scraping (77.7%) > perforation (61.1%) > biological (50%) ≈ control (44%). Protein levels remained stable, but carbohydrate dynamics diverged: biological scarification showed lower starch and final sucrose accumulation, contrasting with the consumption and mobilization in mechanical treatments. PCA clustered mechanical scarification with germination and biomass, whereas biological scarification associated with sucrose. CONCLUSIONS: Biological scarification costs outweigh its benefits in E. crista-galli. This study shows that dormancy release in physically dormant seeds is pathway-dependent, with biological scarification facilitating water entry but compromising physiological integrity and seedling performance. By demonstrating that different scarification routes generate distinct metabolic and developmental outcomes, our findings shift the view of dormancy break from a purely structural process to an integrated physiological filter, with implications for plant regeneration and restoration strategies.

Annals of Botany
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (BR), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Universidade Federal de Pelotas (BR), University of Rio Grande and Rio Grande Community College (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Seed Germination and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.