Clinically Robust Deep Learning for Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: Multicenter Evaluation Across Convolutional Neural Network Architectures

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the impact of anatomically constrained preprocessing and deep learning architecture selection on benign versus malignant breast lesion classification in contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), with the goal of improving robustness and clinical reliability across heterogeneous data sources. METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study, CEM images from 300 patients (314 lesions) were combined with 1003 publicly available CEM images, yielding a total of 1120 breast cases. Automatic breast segmentation was performed using the LIBRA framework to generate breast-mask images. Eleven deep learning models, including classical convolutional neural networks, attention-based networks, hybrid convolutional neural networks (CNNs), Transformer architectures, and mammography-specific models, were trained and evaluated using both original DICOM images and breast-mask inputs. Performance was assessed using accuracy, balanced accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, AUROC, and AUPRC on cross-validation and independent test sets. Hyperparameter optimization was conducted for the best-performing architecture. RESULTS: Models trained on breast-mask images consistently outperformed those trained on original DICOM images across all architectures and metrics, with AUROC improvements ranging from +0.06 to +0.21. Among all models, ResNet50 trained on breast-mask images achieved the best performance (AUROC = 0.931; AUPRC = 0.933; balanced accuracy = 0.834), further improved after optimization (balanced accuracy = 0.886; sensitivity = 0.842; specificity = 0.930). Classical CNN architectures demonstrated performance comparable to or exceeding that of more complex hybrid CNN-Transformer models when anatomically focused preprocessing and rigorous optimization were applied. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomically constrained preprocessing through breast-mask segmentation substantially enhances deep learning performance and stability in CEM-based breast lesion classification. These findings indicate that input representation quality and training optimization are critical determinants of clinically relevant performance, often outweighing architectural complexity, and may support more reliable AI-assisted decision support in CEM workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13040475
Primary Topic
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinically Robust Deep Learning for Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: Multicenter Evaluation Across Convolutional Neural Network Architectures

Vincenza Granata, Antonella Petrillo, Giulia Capuano, Daniele La Forgia et al.
Bioengineering
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
article

Clinically Robust Deep Learning for Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: Multicenter Evaluation Across Convolutional Neural Network Architectures

Vincenza Granata, Antonella Petrillo, Giulia Capuano, Daniele La Forgia, Roberta Galdiero, Paolo Vallone, Roberta Fusco, Teresa Petrosino, Annamaria Porto, Davide Pupo, Mauro Mattace Raso, Filippo Tovecci, Maria Daniela Iasevoli, Fabiana Antenucci, Caterina Todisco, Modesta Longobucco, Roberto Morcavallo, Mario Sansone, Mimma Castaldo, Gerardo Ferrara
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the impact of anatomically constrained preprocessing and deep learning architecture selection on benign versus malignant breast lesion classification in contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), with the goal of improving robustness and clinical reliability across heterogeneous data sources. METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study, CEM images from 300 patients (314 lesions) were combined with 1003 publicly available CEM images, yielding a total of 1120 breast cases. Automatic breast segmentation was performed using the LIBRA framework to generate breast-mask images. Eleven deep learning models, including classical convolutional neural networks, attention-based networks, hybrid convolutional neural networks (CNNs), Transformer architectures, and mammography-specific models, were trained and evaluated using both original DICOM images and breast-mask inputs. Performance was assessed using accuracy, balanced accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, AUROC, and AUPRC on cross-validation and independent test sets. Hyperparameter optimization was conducted for the best-performing architecture. RESULTS: Models trained on breast-mask images consistently outperformed those trained on original DICOM images across all architectures and metrics, with AUROC improvements ranging from +0.06 to +0.21. Among all models, ResNet50 trained on breast-mask images achieved the best performance (AUROC = 0.931; AUPRC = 0.933; balanced accuracy = 0.834), further improved after optimization (balanced accuracy = 0.886; sensitivity = 0.842; specificity = 0.930). Classical CNN architectures demonstrated performance comparable to or exceeding that of more complex hybrid CNN-Transformer models when anatomically focused preprocessing and rigorous optimization were applied. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomically constrained preprocessing through breast-mask segmentation substantially enhances deep learning performance and stability in CEM-based breast lesion classification. These findings indicate that input representation quality and training optimization are critical determinants of clinically relevant performance, often outweighing architectural complexity, and may support more reliable AI-assisted decision support in CEM workflows.

BioengineeringVol. 13(4)
Istituto Tumori Bari (IT), Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.