Body Size and Bladder Cancer Risk: A Pooled Analysis of Prospective Studies From the National Cancer Institute Cohort Consortium

PURPOSE: Body size is an established risk factor for several cancers, but associations with bladder cancer risk remain unclear. METHODS: We pooled data from 2,533,008 participants in 30 international cohort studies to assess associations of BMI, waist circumference, and height with bladder cancer risk. Multivariable Cox regression models, including smoking status, duration, and other confounders, were run separately by cohort and sex, and results combined by random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: increment was 1.07 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.09) for males and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.97 to 1.04) for females. Higher waist circumference was also associated with increased risk of bladder cancer for males (HR per 10 cm increase 1.06 [95% CI, 1.03 to 1.08]) but not females (HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.97 to 1.04]). Results for height were largely consistent with those for BMI and waist circumference, with strong and consistent evidence for males, but not females. CONCLUSION: Larger body size is associated with increased risk of bladder cancer for males, but not females. Public health interventions to prevent overweight and obesity, along with smoking cessation and reduced occupational exposure to bladder carcinogens, are likely to reduce bladder cancer incidence worldwide.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-25-02155
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Body Size and Bladder Cancer Risk: A Pooled Analysis of Prospective Studies From the National Cancer Institute Cohort Consortium

Piet A. van den Brandt, Sven Sandin, Brian Z. Huang, Matt J. Barnett et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

Body Size and Bladder Cancer Risk: A Pooled Analysis of Prospective Studies From the National Cancer Institute Cohort Consortium

Piet A. van den Brandt, Sven Sandin, Brian Z. Huang, Matt J. Barnett, Mara Z. Vitolins, Heather M. Munro, Eleanor L. Watts, Mingyang Song, Guri Skeie, Eva Schernhammer, Jessica L. Petrick, Agneta Åkesson, Victoria A. Kirsh, Amy E. Millen, Linda M. Liao, Mayo Hirabayashi, Fulvio Ricceri, Lorelei Ann Mucci, Gretchen L. Gierach, Debra T. Silverman, Martha J. Shrubsole, Jo L. Freudenheim, Brigid Mary Lynch, Kimberly A. Bertrand, Kim Robien, Rachael Z. Stolzenberg‐Solomon, Chaoran Ma, Alicja Wolk, Nina Afshar, Susanna C. Larsson, Caroline Y. Um, Julie R. Palmer, Wen‐Yi Huang, Mark A. Preston, James V. Lacey, Mridul Datta, Anna Prizment, Marissa M. Shams-White, Steven C. Moore, Sophia Wang, Florence Le Calvez-Kelm, Elisabete Weiderpass, Xuehong Zhang, Hans-Olov Adami, Walter C. Willett, Elizabeth A. Platz, Thomas E. Rohan, Emily White, Norie Sawada, Stella Koutros, Jian-Min Yuan, Samantha Rees, Woon-Puay Koh, Hui Cai, Rashmi Sinha, Alpa V. Patel, Heather M. Ochs-Balcom, Xiao-Ou Shu, Chu Chen, Marian L. Neuhouser, Nathaniel Rothman, Gong Yang, Molin Wang, A. Heather Eliassen, Stephanie A. Smith-Warner, The Pooling Project of Prospective Studies of Diet and Cancer, Roger L. Milne, Song-Yi Park, Edward Giovannucci, Kala Visvanathan, 郑维 Wei Zheng, Maria Regina Martinez
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Body size is an established risk factor for several cancers, but associations with bladder cancer risk remain unclear. METHODS: We pooled data from 2,533,008 participants in 30 international cohort studies to assess associations of BMI, waist circumference, and height with bladder cancer risk. Multivariable Cox regression models, including smoking status, duration, and other confounders, were run separately by cohort and sex, and results combined by random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: increment was 1.07 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.09) for males and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.97 to 1.04) for females. Higher waist circumference was also associated with increased risk of bladder cancer for males (HR per 10 cm increase 1.06 [95% CI, 1.03 to 1.08]) but not females (HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.97 to 1.04]). Results for height were largely consistent with those for BMI and waist circumference, with strong and consistent evidence for males, but not females. CONCLUSION: Larger body size is associated with increased risk of bladder cancer for males, but not females. Public health interventions to prevent overweight and obesity, along with smoking cessation and reduced occupational exposure to bladder carcinogens, are likely to reduce bladder cancer incidence worldwide.

Journal of Clinical Oncology
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.