The dialectics of good and evil in state power: a model of master-slave asymmetry

State power possesses an inherent dialectic of good and evil, rooted in the fundamental tension between the asymmetrical nature of the master-slave relationship and the ethical pursuit of symmetrical recognition. This paper depicts this dialectical process as a movement: it begins with the false harmony of Substantive Good, subsequently falls into the evil of a Bad Infinite stalemate where antagonism becomes ontological, and then attempts to achieve an ideal formal reconciliation in Noble Consciousness. However, this formal recognition, lacking material support, is ultimately doomed to alienate into a new round of false harmony. To break this cycle of good and evil, this paper argues for internalizing substantive recognition based on production relations as a necessary moment in the dialectic of state power, thereby transcending abstract ethical reconciliation. This framework, which is both diagnostic and normative, not only penetrates the antagonistic pathology of contemporary politics but also reconstructs the standard of a “good” state as a fundamental shift from Bildung-Formal Recognition to Production-Substantive Recognition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07294-w
Primary Topic
Foucault, Power, and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The dialectics of good and evil in state power: a model of master-slave asymmetry

Dan Zhu, Hao Zhao
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Foucault, Power, and Ethics
article

The dialectics of good and evil in state power: a model of master-slave asymmetry

Dan Zhu, Hao Zhao
article en

Abstract

State power possesses an inherent dialectic of good and evil, rooted in the fundamental tension between the asymmetrical nature of the master-slave relationship and the ethical pursuit of symmetrical recognition. This paper depicts this dialectical process as a movement: it begins with the false harmony of Substantive Good, subsequently falls into the evil of a Bad Infinite stalemate where antagonism becomes ontological, and then attempts to achieve an ideal formal reconciliation in Noble Consciousness. However, this formal recognition, lacking material support, is ultimately doomed to alienate into a new round of false harmony. To break this cycle of good and evil, this paper argues for internalizing substantive recognition based on production relations as a necessary moment in the dialectic of state power, thereby transcending abstract ethical reconciliation. This framework, which is both diagnostic and normative, not only penetrates the antagonistic pathology of contemporary politics but also reconstructs the standard of a “good” state as a fundamental shift from Bildung-Formal Recognition to Production-Substantive Recognition.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 13(1)
Hainan University (CN), Southeast University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Foucault, Power, and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.