The value of values: Rethinking flood adaptation practices

Adaptation practitioners and researchers have known for some time that values influence uptake and direction of plans. At the same time, adaptation practitioners and researchers have been emphasizing the importance of equitable adaptation. Various values and equity-based approaches have emerged in response. However, how participants in adaptation – whether they are communities, nations, states/provinces, cities, practitioners, researchers, or consultants – determine, define, prioritize, categorize, and apply values has often been left unstated. This gap raises a crucial question: what does an explicit inclusion of values in adaptation research and practice look like? This article demonstrates that adaptation research and practice can be guided by explicit values and how these values were operationalized in one project. The team developed a guiding values statement to articulate and align shared principles, alongside a set of desired actions informed by these values. This was done by foregrounding Indigenous perspectives and a relational approach to the development of the values statement. The values not only shaped the larger project, but research within it as well. The article also explores the choices that shaped the process, offering insights into how teams can navigate the complex dynamics of transdisciplinary collaboration. This article aims to provide others with a pathway for applying co-produced values into their own work and contributes to the growing body of work that emphasizes the importance of values and equity in adaptation. • This article demonstrates that adaptation research and practice can be guided by explicitly co-produced values. • The article demonstrates how values can be operationalized to guide adaptation research and practice. • This perspective provides researchers with a pathway for applying co-produced values into their own work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Policy
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104385
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The value of values: Rethinking flood adaptation practices

Andréanne Doyon, Kees Lokman, Maggie Low, Vanessa Lueck
Environmental Science & Policy
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

The value of values: Rethinking flood adaptation practices

Andréanne Doyon, Kees Lokman, Maggie Low, Vanessa Lueck
article en

Abstract

Adaptation practitioners and researchers have known for some time that values influence uptake and direction of plans. At the same time, adaptation practitioners and researchers have been emphasizing the importance of equitable adaptation. Various values and equity-based approaches have emerged in response. However, how participants in adaptation – whether they are communities, nations, states/provinces, cities, practitioners, researchers, or consultants – determine, define, prioritize, categorize, and apply values has often been left unstated. This gap raises a crucial question: what does an explicit inclusion of values in adaptation research and practice look like? This article demonstrates that adaptation research and practice can be guided by explicit values and how these values were operationalized in one project. The team developed a guiding values statement to articulate and align shared principles, alongside a set of desired actions informed by these values. This was done by foregrounding Indigenous perspectives and a relational approach to the development of the values statement. The values not only shaped the larger project, but research within it as well. The article also explores the choices that shaped the process, offering insights into how teams can navigate the complex dynamics of transdisciplinary collaboration. This article aims to provide others with a pathway for applying co-produced values into their own work and contributes to the growing body of work that emphasizes the importance of values and equity in adaptation. • This article demonstrates that adaptation research and practice can be guided by explicitly co-produced values. • The article demonstrates how values can be operationalized to guide adaptation research and practice. • This perspective provides researchers with a pathway for applying co-produced values into their own work.

Environmental Science & PolicyVol. 179
University of Wyoming (US), University of British Columbia (CA), Vancouver Community College (CA), Simon Fraser University (CA), University of Victoria (CA), Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions (CA), Arizona State University (US)
Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.