Prophylactic tirofiban versus oral dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms carries the risk of perioperative thromboembolism and bleeding, and the optimal prophylactic antiplatelet strategy remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic tirofiban administration compared with oral dual antiplatelet (DAP) therapy. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases for relevant studies up to August 2, 2023. All data analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 14.0. RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials with a total of 806 participants receiving endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms were included. The results indicated that prophylactic monotherapy with tirofiban was associated with significantly higher rate of good clinical outcome (risk ratio [RR]: 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.28, P = .01). It also reduced the incidence of thromboembolic (RR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.26-0.74, P = .002) and hemorrhagic (RR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.24-0.91, P = .03) events. Subgroup analyses further revealed the benefits of prophylactic tirofiban in combination with DAP therapy in reducing the incidence of hemorrhagic events, with a trend of reducing thromboembolic events. Meanwhile, prophylactic monotherapy with tirofiban reduced the incidence of thromboembolic events without increasing the incidence of hemorrhagic events. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated the robustness of all pooled results, but it was not possible to remove the negative impact of publication bias on the pooled results. CONCLUSION: These findings support the prophylactic administration of tirofiban to patients undergoing endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms, as it was associated with a significantly lower incidence of thromboembolic events without increasing the risk of hemorrhagic events. More studies are needed to determine differences between prophylactic monotherapy with tirofiban and prophylactic tirofiban in combination with DAP therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000048070
Primary Topic
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prophylactic tirofiban versus oral dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A meta-analysis

Jiaqi Chen, Qiming Li, Zike Liu, Yvlu Miao
Medicine
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
article

Prophylactic tirofiban versus oral dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A meta-analysis

Jiaqi Chen, Qiming Li, Zike Liu, Yvlu Miao
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms carries the risk of perioperative thromboembolism and bleeding, and the optimal prophylactic antiplatelet strategy remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic tirofiban administration compared with oral dual antiplatelet (DAP) therapy. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases for relevant studies up to August 2, 2023. All data analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 14.0. RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials with a total of 806 participants receiving endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms were included. The results indicated that prophylactic monotherapy with tirofiban was associated with significantly higher rate of good clinical outcome (risk ratio [RR]: 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.28, P = .01). It also reduced the incidence of thromboembolic (RR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.26-0.74, P = .002) and hemorrhagic (RR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.24-0.91, P = .03) events. Subgroup analyses further revealed the benefits of prophylactic tirofiban in combination with DAP therapy in reducing the incidence of hemorrhagic events, with a trend of reducing thromboembolic events. Meanwhile, prophylactic monotherapy with tirofiban reduced the incidence of thromboembolic events without increasing the incidence of hemorrhagic events. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated the robustness of all pooled results, but it was not possible to remove the negative impact of publication bias on the pooled results. CONCLUSION: These findings support the prophylactic administration of tirofiban to patients undergoing endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms, as it was associated with a significantly lower incidence of thromboembolic events without increasing the risk of hemorrhagic events. More studies are needed to determine differences between prophylactic monotherapy with tirofiban and prophylactic tirofiban in combination with DAP therapy.

MedicineVol. 105(16)
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Longgang Central Hospital (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.