Metrology of rare earths and other elements in waste fluorescent lamp powder – A methodological comparison

The recycling of rare earth elements (REEs) from electronic waste is critical for supporting clean energy technologies, yet accurate quantification remains challenging due to the lack of standardized analytical methods and certified reference materials. Waste fluorescent lamp powder (FLP) is a promising secondary source of REEs, but its heterogeneous composition and complex matrices hinder reliable analysis. This study addresses the problem of method selection for FLP characterization by comparing multiple sample preparation and analytical techniques to identify workflows that ensure accurate and reproducible quantification. Four sample preparation methods: 1) alkaline fusion for solutions (AFS), 2) alkaline fusion for glass disks (AFG), 3) microwave digestion (MWD), and 4) focused infrared digestion (FIRD) were evaluated using ICP-MS/MS, ICP-OES, MP-AES, and ED-XRF. A synthetic FLP material and seven real FLP samples were analyzed to assess accuracy and feed variability. AFS achieved complete dissolution and provided the most consistent results across plasma-based techniques, while AFG enabled stable fused disks for XRF analysis. Acid digestion with phosphoric–sulfuric mixtures improved recoveries compared to aqua regia but remained less effective than fusion. ICP-MS/MS and ICP-OES delivered comparable accuracy for REEs, whereas MP-AES underestimated REEs and ED-XRF slightly overestimated Eu. Temporal analysis of real FLP samples revealed significant compositional variability, underscoring the need for robust protocols. Alkaline fusion combined with ICP-MS/MS or ICP-OES offers the most reliable approach for FLP characterization, while ED-XRF on fused disks provides a practical option for routine monitoring. These findings establish a validated analytical framework for e-waste streams lacking certified reference materials, supporting accurate resource recovery and advancing circular economy initiatives. • Systematic comparison of four digestion methods for complex fluorescent lamp phosphors (FLP) matrices. • Alkaline fusion ensures complete dissolution and minimizes analytical bias. • ICP-MS/MS and ICP-OES deliver robust multi-element quantification of REEs. • Synthetic FLP material enables method validation without certified standards. • Workflow improves traceability and reproducibility in e-waste metrology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analytica Chimica Acta
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2026.345542
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metrology of rare earths and other elements in waste fluorescent lamp powder – A methodological comparison

Frédéric‐Georges Fontaine, Dominic Larivière, Audrey Laberge-Carignan, Mélodie Bonin
Analytica Chimica Acta
Extraction and Separation Processes
article

Metrology of rare earths and other elements in waste fluorescent lamp powder – A methodological comparison

Frédéric‐Georges Fontaine, Dominic Larivière, Audrey Laberge-Carignan, Mélodie Bonin
article en

Abstract

The recycling of rare earth elements (REEs) from electronic waste is critical for supporting clean energy technologies, yet accurate quantification remains challenging due to the lack of standardized analytical methods and certified reference materials. Waste fluorescent lamp powder (FLP) is a promising secondary source of REEs, but its heterogeneous composition and complex matrices hinder reliable analysis. This study addresses the problem of method selection for FLP characterization by comparing multiple sample preparation and analytical techniques to identify workflows that ensure accurate and reproducible quantification. Four sample preparation methods: 1) alkaline fusion for solutions (AFS), 2) alkaline fusion for glass disks (AFG), 3) microwave digestion (MWD), and 4) focused infrared digestion (FIRD) were evaluated using ICP-MS/MS, ICP-OES, MP-AES, and ED-XRF. A synthetic FLP material and seven real FLP samples were analyzed to assess accuracy and feed variability. AFS achieved complete dissolution and provided the most consistent results across plasma-based techniques, while AFG enabled stable fused disks for XRF analysis. Acid digestion with phosphoric–sulfuric mixtures improved recoveries compared to aqua regia but remained less effective than fusion. ICP-MS/MS and ICP-OES delivered comparable accuracy for REEs, whereas MP-AES underestimated REEs and ED-XRF slightly overestimated Eu. Temporal analysis of real FLP samples revealed significant compositional variability, underscoring the need for robust protocols. Alkaline fusion combined with ICP-MS/MS or ICP-OES offers the most reliable approach for FLP characterization, while ED-XRF on fused disks provides a practical option for routine monitoring. These findings establish a validated analytical framework for e-waste streams lacking certified reference materials, supporting accurate resource recovery and advancing circular economy initiatives. • Systematic comparison of four digestion methods for complex fluorescent lamp phosphors (FLP) matrices. • Alkaline fusion ensures complete dissolution and minimizes analytical bias. • ICP-MS/MS and ICP-OES deliver robust multi-element quantification of REEs. • Synthetic FLP material enables method validation without certified standards. • Workflow improves traceability and reproducibility in e-waste metrology.

Analytica Chimica ActaVol. 1408
Université Laval (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Extraction and Separation Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.