Tracking governance and SDG progress in Africa: falling behind or leading the way?

Purpose This study aims to examine whether Africa is falling behind or leading the way in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by analyzing how governance capacity is associated with SDG performance across African regions. Drawing on Governance Network Theory (GNT), the study moves beyond general claims that governance matters to examine how governance–SDG relationships vary across goals and territorial contexts. Design/methodology/approach The study uses a quantitative panel data design covering 46 African countries from 2015 to 2022. SDG performance is measured using the Sustainable Development Report index and SDG trend scores. Governance capacity is proxied by the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) and analyzed using pooled panel regressions and ordered probit models with regional interaction effects to capture heterogeneity across African subregions. Because cross-country data do not allow direct observation of governance networks, the WGI dimensions are interpreted as network-enabling governance capacities, and the results are interpreted through a GNT lens rather than as direct measures of network structure. Findings The results show that governance capacity is positively associated with overall SDG performance, but the strength of this association varies significantly across SDGs and regions. Governance effects are strongest for coordination-intensive goals, notably quality education (SDG 4), gender equality (SDG 5), climate action (SDG 13) and partnerships for the goals (SDG 17). Persistent underperformance is observed in poverty (SDG 1), health (SDG 3) and inequality (SDG 10)-related goals, highlighting governance–performance decoupling in some regions. Practical implications The findings suggest that SDG strategies in Africa should prioritize strengthening coordination capacity, multi-actor collaboration and regional governance networks, rather than relying on uniform governance reforms. Regionally tailored action maps can enhance SDG delivery effectiveness. Social implications By identifying where and why governance capacity translates unevenly into SDG outcomes, the study informs policymakers, development partners and civil society actors seeking inclusive and context-sensitive pathways to sustainable development in Africa. Originality/value The study advances SDG research by operationalizing GNT in a multi-regional African context by showing that governance–SDG relationships in Africa are conditional, regionally embedded and goal-specific, rather than uniformly positive.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-10-2024-1186
Primary Topic
Economic Growth and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tracking governance and SDG progress in Africa: falling behind or leading the way?

Kwadjo Appiagyei, Prince Gyimah, Kingsley Opoku Appiah
Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal
Economic Growth and Development
article

Tracking governance and SDG progress in Africa: falling behind or leading the way?

Kwadjo Appiagyei, Prince Gyimah, Kingsley Opoku Appiah
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine whether Africa is falling behind or leading the way in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by analyzing how governance capacity is associated with SDG performance across African regions. Drawing on Governance Network Theory (GNT), the study moves beyond general claims that governance matters to examine how governance–SDG relationships vary across goals and territorial contexts. Design/methodology/approach The study uses a quantitative panel data design covering 46 African countries from 2015 to 2022. SDG performance is measured using the Sustainable Development Report index and SDG trend scores. Governance capacity is proxied by the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) and analyzed using pooled panel regressions and ordered probit models with regional interaction effects to capture heterogeneity across African subregions. Because cross-country data do not allow direct observation of governance networks, the WGI dimensions are interpreted as network-enabling governance capacities, and the results are interpreted through a GNT lens rather than as direct measures of network structure. Findings The results show that governance capacity is positively associated with overall SDG performance, but the strength of this association varies significantly across SDGs and regions. Governance effects are strongest for coordination-intensive goals, notably quality education (SDG 4), gender equality (SDG 5), climate action (SDG 13) and partnerships for the goals (SDG 17). Persistent underperformance is observed in poverty (SDG 1), health (SDG 3) and inequality (SDG 10)-related goals, highlighting governance–performance decoupling in some regions. Practical implications The findings suggest that SDG strategies in Africa should prioritize strengthening coordination capacity, multi-actor collaboration and regional governance networks, rather than relying on uniform governance reforms. Regionally tailored action maps can enhance SDG delivery effectiveness. Social implications By identifying where and why governance capacity translates unevenly into SDG outcomes, the study informs policymakers, development partners and civil society actors seeking inclusive and context-sensitive pathways to sustainable development in Africa. Originality/value The study advances SDG research by operationalizing GNT in a multi-regional African context by showing that governance–SDG relationships in Africa are conditional, regionally embedded and goal-specific, rather than uniformly positive.

Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal
Murdoch University (AU), Durban University of Technology (ZA), Kumasi Technical University (GH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Economic Growth and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.