Risk Reduction Evaluation of Prescriptive Technical Codes for Hydrogen Refueling Stations Using LOPA

This study evaluates the risk reduction performance of prescriptive technical codes applied to hydrogen refueling stations using a Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) approach. A representative accident scenario involving high-pressure hose rupture at the dispenser was selected as the initiating event, and the initiating event frequency was determined based on CCPS guidelines. The target mitigated event likelihood (TMEL) was set to 1.0×10−6/year, resulting in a required risk reduction factor (RRF) of 1.0×104. Safety devices specified in the Korean Gas Safety (KGS) Codes were identified as independent protection layers (IPLs), and their probability of failure on demand (PFD) values were assigned based on commonly accepted LOPA data. The combined PFD of the identified IPLs was estimated to be 1.0×10−5, leading to a mitigated event likelihood of 1.0×10−7/year, which satisfies the predefined TMEL. These results indicate that the prescriptive technical codes can provide a certain level of quantitative risk reduction when all required safeguards operate as assumed. However, the analysis also reveals structural limitations associated with independence assumptions, potential common cause failures, and maintenance conditions. The findings suggest that integrating functional safety concepts and systematic risk assessment with prescriptive codes could enhance the reliability of safety management for hydrogen refueling stations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19081933
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk Reduction Evaluation of Prescriptive Technical Codes for Hydrogen Refueling Stations Using LOPA

J S Park, Heesoo Chung, Keunwon Lee, Seungho Jung et al.
Energies
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

Risk Reduction Evaluation of Prescriptive Technical Codes for Hydrogen Refueling Stations Using LOPA

J S Park, Heesoo Chung, Keunwon Lee, Seungho Jung, Ho-San Song, Gwyam Shin, Shintak Han
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the risk reduction performance of prescriptive technical codes applied to hydrogen refueling stations using a Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) approach. A representative accident scenario involving high-pressure hose rupture at the dispenser was selected as the initiating event, and the initiating event frequency was determined based on CCPS guidelines. The target mitigated event likelihood (TMEL) was set to 1.0×10−6/year, resulting in a required risk reduction factor (RRF) of 1.0×104. Safety devices specified in the Korean Gas Safety (KGS) Codes were identified as independent protection layers (IPLs), and their probability of failure on demand (PFD) values were assigned based on commonly accepted LOPA data. The combined PFD of the identified IPLs was estimated to be 1.0×10−5, leading to a mitigated event likelihood of 1.0×10−7/year, which satisfies the predefined TMEL. These results indicate that the prescriptive technical codes can provide a certain level of quantitative risk reduction when all required safeguards operate as assumed. However, the analysis also reveals structural limitations associated with independence assumptions, potential common cause failures, and maintenance conditions. The findings suggest that integrating functional safety concepts and systematic risk assessment with prescriptive codes could enhance the reliability of safety management for hydrogen refueling stations.

EnergiesVol. 19(8)
Seoul National University of Science and Technology (KR), Incheon National University (KR), Chungbuk National University (KR), Ajou University (KR)
Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology, Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.