Abstract LB490: Preclinical evaluation of the nectin-4 antibody-drug conjugate MK-3120 (SKB410) in a panel of solid-tumor patient-derived xenograft models

Abstract Despite clinical success of some antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), much remains unknown about what ultimately drives tumor response. Therefore, identification and preclinical testing of selection biomarkers to enrich for responders is critical. MK-3120 (SKB410) is a nectin-4-directed ADC with a unique, bifunctional linker that maximizes payload delivery to tumor cells both through its irreversible connection with a novel anti-nectin-4 monoclonal antibody and pH-sensitive cleavage from a belotecan-derived topo I inhibitor payload in the lysosome. To define molecular determinants of response to nectin-4-targeting ADCs, we evaluated MK-3120 in 48 patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models from indications with documented nectin-4 expression (primarily urothelial, breast, and non-small cell lung cancer). In order to investigate differences in preclinical response biology, we tested enfortumab vedotin in parallel as a comparator ADC that targets the same antigen but delivers MMAE, a microtubule inhibitor. Baseline characterization included nectin-4 immunohistochemistry (IHC; H-score), nectin-4 gene copy number variation (CNV), and RNA sequencing. In a subset of models, nectin-4 CNV and IHC were reassessed after treatment to detect selection-driven changes in surviving tumor tissue. Using a predefined response threshold, 22 of 48 models (46%) responded to MK-3120, while 11 models (23%) responded to enfortumab vedotin; nine models responded to both ADCs. These results indicate tumor-intrinsic heterogeneity in ADC sensitivity and demonstrate that targeting the same antigen does not guarantee cross-response between ADCs with different payloads and linker chemistries. Nectin-4 copy number amplification has been suggested to enrich for responders in clinical trials of nectin-4 targeting agents. Therefore, we investigated the impact of CNV on efficacy of both MK-3120 and enfortumab vedotin. Of the models that responded to MK-3120 and enfortumab vedotin, 15 and 7 models harbored nectin-4 gene amplifications, respectively. In the post-treatment analyses, nectin-4 protein expression (IHC H-score) and CNV showed no consistent, widespread changes after treatment with either ADC. Together, these data demonstrate overlapping but nonidentical responder sets indicating that payload and linker differences shape intrinsic ADC sensitivity, and that biomarker strategies should consider both antigen status and payload-relevant features. Citation Format: Evan Barry, Amy Beebe, Razvan Cristescu, Qingyun Yan, Mingmei Cai, Konstantin Dobrenkov, Gustave Hebert, Douglas Linn, Alan Northrup, Amir Vajdi, Brian Long. Preclinical evaluation of the nectin-4 antibody-drug conjugate MK-3120 (SKB410) in a panel of solid-tumor patient-derived xenograft models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr LB490.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-lb490
Primary Topic
Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract LB490: Preclinical evaluation of the nectin-4 antibody-drug conjugate MK-3120 (SKB410) in a panel of solid-tumor patient-derived xenograft models

Gustave Hebert, Mingmei Cai, Konstantin Dobrenkov, Răzvan Cristescu et al.
Cancer Research
Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
article

Abstract LB490: Preclinical evaluation of the nectin-4 antibody-drug conjugate MK-3120 (SKB410) in a panel of solid-tumor patient-derived xenograft models

Gustave Hebert, Mingmei Cai, Konstantin Dobrenkov, Răzvan Cristescu, D. M. Linn, Amir Vajdi, Qingyun Yan, Evan Barry, Amy Beebe, Alan Northrup, Brian Long
article en

Abstract

Abstract Despite clinical success of some antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), much remains unknown about what ultimately drives tumor response. Therefore, identification and preclinical testing of selection biomarkers to enrich for responders is critical. MK-3120 (SKB410) is a nectin-4-directed ADC with a unique, bifunctional linker that maximizes payload delivery to tumor cells both through its irreversible connection with a novel anti-nectin-4 monoclonal antibody and pH-sensitive cleavage from a belotecan-derived topo I inhibitor payload in the lysosome. To define molecular determinants of response to nectin-4-targeting ADCs, we evaluated MK-3120 in 48 patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models from indications with documented nectin-4 expression (primarily urothelial, breast, and non-small cell lung cancer). In order to investigate differences in preclinical response biology, we tested enfortumab vedotin in parallel as a comparator ADC that targets the same antigen but delivers MMAE, a microtubule inhibitor. Baseline characterization included nectin-4 immunohistochemistry (IHC; H-score), nectin-4 gene copy number variation (CNV), and RNA sequencing. In a subset of models, nectin-4 CNV and IHC were reassessed after treatment to detect selection-driven changes in surviving tumor tissue. Using a predefined response threshold, 22 of 48 models (46%) responded to MK-3120, while 11 models (23%) responded to enfortumab vedotin; nine models responded to both ADCs. These results indicate tumor-intrinsic heterogeneity in ADC sensitivity and demonstrate that targeting the same antigen does not guarantee cross-response between ADCs with different payloads and linker chemistries. Nectin-4 copy number amplification has been suggested to enrich for responders in clinical trials of nectin-4 targeting agents. Therefore, we investigated the impact of CNV on efficacy of both MK-3120 and enfortumab vedotin. Of the models that responded to MK-3120 and enfortumab vedotin, 15 and 7 models harbored nectin-4 gene amplifications, respectively. In the post-treatment analyses, nectin-4 protein expression (IHC H-score) and CNV showed no consistent, widespread changes after treatment with either ADC. Together, these data demonstrate overlapping but nonidentical responder sets indicating that payload and linker differences shape intrinsic ADC sensitivity, and that biomarker strategies should consider both antigen status and payload-relevant features. Citation Format: Evan Barry, Amy Beebe, Razvan Cristescu, Qingyun Yan, Mingmei Cai, Konstantin Dobrenkov, Gustave Hebert, Douglas Linn, Alan Northrup, Amir Vajdi, Brian Long. Preclinical evaluation of the nectin-4 antibody-drug conjugate MK-3120 (SKB410) in a panel of solid-tumor patient-derived xenograft models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr LB490.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(8_Supplement)
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.