Real-world evidence on second line chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract carcinoma refractory to gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GemOx)

BACKGROUND: Advanced biliary tract carcinoma (aBTC) comes with poor prognosis. Gemcitabine with oxaliplatin (GemOx) has emerged as a pragmatic alternative to gemcitabine with cisplatin and has been a preferred first line palliative option at many centres around the world. The evidence on second line chemotherapy following treatment failure of GemOx is scarce. METHODS: A retrospective multicentre cohort study in the Southeast healthcare region of Sweden, covering nine years (2011-2020) and three hospitals, was conducted. All patients with aBTC who had received first line GemOx and any second line treatment thereafter were included. Treatment patterns and clinicopathological prognostic parameters were explored. RESULTS: In a cohort of 121 patients with aBTC who had received GemOx in the first line setting, 57 (47%) had proceeded to any type of second line systemic therapy and were included in this study. The most used regimen was capecitabine single agent in 37 (64.9%) patients followed by intravenous 5-FU (9, 15.8%). Median overall survival (OS) in the total cohort was 4.1 months (95% CI 3.2-5.0). Six- and twelve-month survival rates were 35.6% and 18.6%. Median time to treatment failure (TTF) was 1.8 months (95% CI 1.5-2.2). Performance status (PS) 2, according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), was an independent predictor for poor OS and TTF. Progression free survival (PFS) of < 6 months during first line treatment and extrahepatic localisation were independent predictors for poor OS. A nomogram was established using ECOG PS, 1st line PFS and primary tumour site. An exploratory prognostic model showed that patients with high total score in the nomogram had OS of 2.9 months compared to 4.3 months in patients with intermediate score and 13.1 months in patients with low score. CONCLUSION: Patients with aBTC receiving second line chemotherapy following first line GemOx have very dismal prognosis. PS 0-1, first line PFS ≥ 6 months and intrahepatic disease localisation indicate better prognosis. These data highlight the need for improved and personalised treatment strategies in refractory aBTC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-16009-y
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world evidence on second line chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract carcinoma refractory to gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GemOx)

Emma Gränsmark, Nils Elander, Hanna Lagenfelt, Hakon Blomstrand
BMC Cancer
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
article

Real-world evidence on second line chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract carcinoma refractory to gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GemOx)

Emma Gränsmark, Nils Elander, Hanna Lagenfelt, Hakon Blomstrand
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advanced biliary tract carcinoma (aBTC) comes with poor prognosis. Gemcitabine with oxaliplatin (GemOx) has emerged as a pragmatic alternative to gemcitabine with cisplatin and has been a preferred first line palliative option at many centres around the world. The evidence on second line chemotherapy following treatment failure of GemOx is scarce. METHODS: A retrospective multicentre cohort study in the Southeast healthcare region of Sweden, covering nine years (2011-2020) and three hospitals, was conducted. All patients with aBTC who had received first line GemOx and any second line treatment thereafter were included. Treatment patterns and clinicopathological prognostic parameters were explored. RESULTS: In a cohort of 121 patients with aBTC who had received GemOx in the first line setting, 57 (47%) had proceeded to any type of second line systemic therapy and were included in this study. The most used regimen was capecitabine single agent in 37 (64.9%) patients followed by intravenous 5-FU (9, 15.8%). Median overall survival (OS) in the total cohort was 4.1 months (95% CI 3.2-5.0). Six- and twelve-month survival rates were 35.6% and 18.6%. Median time to treatment failure (TTF) was 1.8 months (95% CI 1.5-2.2). Performance status (PS) 2, according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), was an independent predictor for poor OS and TTF. Progression free survival (PFS) of < 6 months during first line treatment and extrahepatic localisation were independent predictors for poor OS. A nomogram was established using ECOG PS, 1st line PFS and primary tumour site. An exploratory prognostic model showed that patients with high total score in the nomogram had OS of 2.9 months compared to 4.3 months in patients with intermediate score and 13.1 months in patients with low score. CONCLUSION: Patients with aBTC receiving second line chemotherapy following first line GemOx have very dismal prognosis. PS 0-1, first line PFS ≥ 6 months and intrahepatic disease localisation indicate better prognosis. These data highlight the need for improved and personalised treatment strategies in refractory aBTC.

BMC CancerVol. 26(1)
Linköping University (SE), County Administrative Board (SE), Landstinget i Kalmar län (SE), Linköping University Hospital (SE), Region Östergötland
Forskningsrådet i Sydöstra Sverige, Region Östergötland, Linköpings Universitet, Medical Research Council
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.