A scoping review of the Australian spinal cord injury research landscape: Insights and implications for research impact

CONTEXT: A systematic approach to undertaking spinal cord injury (SCI) related research will maximize the use of limited research funds and ensure that all stakeholders collaborate to address barriers to producing relevant, impactful research. OBJECTIVE: To examine the breadth and scope of Australian SCI research published between January 2018 and September 2025. METHODS: A systematic search of five relevant databases for Australian spinal cord injury research published from January 2018 to September 2025 was completed. RESULTS: = 38; 14%) focused on discovery science and secondary conditions, with research into neuroprotection and regeneration representing the next largest category. Sixteen publications, all clinical, engaged people with lived experience in the research process. CONCLUSION: This review identified several issues that impact the efficiency and impact of SCI research in Australia, many of which are relevant to other jurisdictions. Issues include limited multi-center collaborations in both clinical and preclinical research, low engagement of people with lived experience in the research process, and a dearth of research from primary care. To maximize the use of finite research funds, all stakeholders with an interest in SCI outcomes should work together to define research priorities and strategically address barriers to producing relevant, impactful research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2026.2644732
Primary Topic
Spinal Cord Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A scoping review of the Australian spinal cord injury research landscape: Insights and implications for research impact

Marnie Graco, Linda Barclay, Marc J. Ruitenberg
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Spinal Cord Injury Research
article

A scoping review of the Australian spinal cord injury research landscape: Insights and implications for research impact

Marnie Graco, Linda Barclay, Marc J. Ruitenberg
article en

Abstract

CONTEXT: A systematic approach to undertaking spinal cord injury (SCI) related research will maximize the use of limited research funds and ensure that all stakeholders collaborate to address barriers to producing relevant, impactful research. OBJECTIVE: To examine the breadth and scope of Australian SCI research published between January 2018 and September 2025. METHODS: A systematic search of five relevant databases for Australian spinal cord injury research published from January 2018 to September 2025 was completed. RESULTS: = 38; 14%) focused on discovery science and secondary conditions, with research into neuroprotection and regeneration representing the next largest category. Sixteen publications, all clinical, engaged people with lived experience in the research process. CONCLUSION: This review identified several issues that impact the efficiency and impact of SCI research in Australia, many of which are relevant to other jurisdictions. Issues include limited multi-center collaborations in both clinical and preclinical research, low engagement of people with lived experience in the research process, and a dearth of research from primary care. To maximize the use of finite research funds, all stakeholders with an interest in SCI outcomes should work together to define research priorities and strategically address barriers to producing relevant, impactful research.

Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), Institute for Breathing and Sleep (AU), Austin Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Spinal Cord Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.