Investment Performance of Private Pension Plans: Defined Benefit vs. Defined Contribution

Using data on over 160,000 U.S. private pension plans, we analyze the investment performance of defined benefit (DB) and defined contribution (DC) plans. We find a positive asset size effect in performance, stronger in DB plans partly because of greater economies of scale in administrative expenses. Small DB plans underperform small DC plans on various performance metrics and face the highest termination risk. After adjusting for investable passive benchmarks, DC plans outperform DB plans in all but the largest size decile. Our findings suggest that plan consolidation and converting small DB plans to the DC structure are likely to improve the efficiency of pension financing. This paper was accepted by Camelia Kuhnen, finance. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.05241 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.05241
Primary Topic
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investment Performance of Private Pension Plans: Defined Benefit vs. Defined Contribution

Youchang Wu, Donghyeok Jang
Management Science
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
article

Investment Performance of Private Pension Plans: Defined Benefit vs. Defined Contribution

Youchang Wu, Donghyeok Jang
article en

Abstract

Using data on over 160,000 U.S. private pension plans, we analyze the investment performance of defined benefit (DB) and defined contribution (DC) plans. We find a positive asset size effect in performance, stronger in DB plans partly because of greater economies of scale in administrative expenses. Small DB plans underperform small DC plans on various performance metrics and face the highest termination risk. After adjusting for investable passive benchmarks, DC plans outperform DB plans in all but the largest size decile. Our findings suggest that plan consolidation and converting small DB plans to the DC structure are likely to improve the efficiency of pension financing. This paper was accepted by Camelia Kuhnen, finance. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.05241 .

Management Science
University of Oregon (US), American University of Sharjah (AE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Investment Performance of Private Pension Plans: Defined Benefit vs. Defined Contribution — Youchang Wu, Donghyeok Jang · Management Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS