SWOT Satellite Observations of the Kakhovka Dam Break Flood Highlight Limitations of Outburst Flood Models

Abstract The 6 June 2023 failure of the Kakhovka Dam generated a catastrophic outburst flood, leading to loss of life and infrastructure damage. During the flood, daily measurements of water surface elevation were collected by the SWOT satellite, providing the first direct, high‐resolution 2D measurements of a large outburst flood. We compared SWOT measurements with 2D numerical hydraulic simulations to evaluate the ability of flood models to reproduce outburst flood stage. Simulations reliant on minimally constrained, globally available reservoir bathymetry significantly underestimate flood stage. Modifying reservoir and channel bathymetry to reflect geomorphology produces better agreement with SWOT, and is closer to in situ reservoir bed elevations, yet still fails to reproduce both flood stage and timing. SWOT's unprecedented direct measurements suggest that 2D flood models may not capture outburst flood dynamics at a level useful for geohazard decision making and demonstrate the need for more observational validation of this destructive and costly geohazard.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl120832
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SWOT Satellite Observations of the Kakhovka Dam Break Flood Highlight Limitations of Outburst Flood Models

Tamlin M. Pavelsky, Karin Lehnigk, K. A. Lang
Geophysical Research Letters
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

SWOT Satellite Observations of the Kakhovka Dam Break Flood Highlight Limitations of Outburst Flood Models

Tamlin M. Pavelsky, Karin Lehnigk, K. A. Lang
article en

Abstract

Abstract The 6 June 2023 failure of the Kakhovka Dam generated a catastrophic outburst flood, leading to loss of life and infrastructure damage. During the flood, daily measurements of water surface elevation were collected by the SWOT satellite, providing the first direct, high‐resolution 2D measurements of a large outburst flood. We compared SWOT measurements with 2D numerical hydraulic simulations to evaluate the ability of flood models to reproduce outburst flood stage. Simulations reliant on minimally constrained, globally available reservoir bathymetry significantly underestimate flood stage. Modifying reservoir and channel bathymetry to reflect geomorphology produces better agreement with SWOT, and is closer to in situ reservoir bed elevations, yet still fails to reproduce both flood stage and timing. SWOT's unprecedented direct measurements suggest that 2D flood models may not capture outburst flood dynamics at a level useful for geohazard decision making and demonstrate the need for more observational validation of this destructive and costly geohazard.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 53(8)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Science Mission Directorate
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.