Employer childcare and flexible working in Germany and the United States: How relevant are female leaders and organised labour?

Abstract This study examines how public policy and organisational characteristics relate to employer family policies, applying a theory-testing approach at the meso (employer) level. Expanding debates in comparative research on employer behaviour, we distinguish analytically between normative and economic logics and assess their explanatory relevance across policy contexts. Comparing Germany (IAB Establishment Panel) and the United States (National Study of Employers), the findings indicate that normative logics better explain employer-provided childcare, which is more prevalent in Germany, where economic pressure should generally be lower. By contrast, economic logics better explain employer-provided flexible working in the absence of public flexible-work policy. However, when examining female leadership and organised labour at the organisational level, the expected alignment between policy context and dominant logic does not always hold. Taken together, the findings show that meso-level tests of competing logics can clarify how employee segments relate to employer family policies across contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/ics.2026.10093
Primary Topic
Work-Family Balance Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Employer childcare and flexible working in Germany and the United States: How relevant are female leaders and organised labour?

Marina Hagen, Rosa Daiger von Gleichen, Daniela Grunow
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy
Work-Family Balance Challenges
article

Employer childcare and flexible working in Germany and the United States: How relevant are female leaders and organised labour?

Marina Hagen, Rosa Daiger von Gleichen, Daniela Grunow
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines how public policy and organisational characteristics relate to employer family policies, applying a theory-testing approach at the meso (employer) level. Expanding debates in comparative research on employer behaviour, we distinguish analytically between normative and economic logics and assess their explanatory relevance across policy contexts. Comparing Germany (IAB Establishment Panel) and the United States (National Study of Employers), the findings indicate that normative logics better explain employer-provided childcare, which is more prevalent in Germany, where economic pressure should generally be lower. By contrast, economic logics better explain employer-provided flexible working in the absence of public flexible-work policy. However, when examining female leadership and organised labour at the organisational level, the expected alignment between policy context and dominant logic does not always hold. Taken together, the findings show that meso-level tests of competing logics can clarify how employee segments relate to employer family policies across contexts.

Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Heinrich Böll Stiftung, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Economic and Social Research Council
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Work-Family Balance Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.