Abstract CT029: Five-year survival with tebentafusp in previously untreated metastatic uveal melanoma in a phase 3 trial

Abstract Background: Metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) has a very poor prognosis with a historical survival rate of <10% at 5 yrs. Tebentafusp, a first in class ImmTAC bispecific (gp100 x CD3), is approved for adult HLA-A*02:01+ patients with unresectable or mUM based on a phase 3 study demonstrating improved overall survival (OS) compared to investigator’s choice (IC) (HR 0.51; IMCgp100-202; NCT03070392). This benefit was maintained at the 3-yr follow-up (HR 0.68), with a 3-yr OS rate of 27% for tebentafusp and 18% for IC. Molecular response assessed by ctDNA reduction was a better indicator of OS benefit than traditional RECISTv1.1 measurements. Here we report updated analyses of OS after a minimum follow-up of 5 yrs. Methods: In this randomized, open-label, Phase 3 trial, first line HLA-A*02:01+ mUM patients were randomized 2:1 to receive tebentafusp or IC of single-agent pembrolizumab, ipilimumab or dacarbazine, stratified by lactate dehydrogenase. Primary endpoint was OS. ctDNA reduction was an exploratory endpoint. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and treatment effects compared using Cox proportional hazards model. A Cox model, adjusted for baseline and time-varying covariates at progression, compared post-progression survival in tebentafusp patients with versus without treatment beyond radiographic progression (TBP). Results: 378 patients were randomized to tebentafusp (252) or IC (126; 82% pembrolizumab). With extended follow-up, the OS continued to favor tebentafusp, with a stratified hazard ratio of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.54-0.85). The 5-year OS rate for tebentafusp was 16% (95% CI, 11-21) vs 8% (95% CI, 4-14) for IC. The OS benefit was evident even in patients with known poor prognostic factors, including those with large tumors ≥ 10 cm. OS benefit was also seen in patients who did not have radiographic response including those with best response of progressive disease (PD) or those with a best change of tumor growth (>20%). Notably, in the tebentafusp arm, TBP was associated with better OS compared to no TBP, even after adjusting for covariates (HR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.44-0.83). In tebentafusp-treated patients, longer OS was associated with undetectable ctDNA at baseline or ctDNA reductions ≥50% by week 9. Among 21 ctDNA-evaluable patients who survived ≥ 5 years, 15 had undetectable baseline ctDNA and the remaining 6 had ctDNA clearance. Deep reductions in ctDNA were seen in patients regardless of baseline tumor burden and across all RECIST categories. Conclusions: Tebentafusp demonstrates durable, long-term OS benefit in first line HLA-A*02:01+ patients, which at 5 years is the longest OS follow-up in a randomized trial in mUM. OS benefit is evident in those with poor prognostic factors and remains independent of radiographic response, with ctDNA levels proving to be a better indicator of activity. This is the first report of long-term OS benefit in a solid tumor treated with an ImmTAC therapy. Citation Format: Paul Nathan, Sophie Piperno-Neumann, Jessica C. Hassel, Marcus O. Butler, Max Schlaak, Ryan J. Sullivan, Reinhard Dummer, John M. Kirkwood, Joseph J. Sacco, Alexander N. Shoushtari, Josep M. Piulats, April KS Salama, Marlana Orloff, Anthony M. Joshua, Sebastian Ochsenreither, Lauris Gastaud, Brendan Curti, Lev Demidov, Mohammed Milhem, Bartosz Chmielowski, Kari Kendra, Paolo Antonio Ascierto, Eric H. Bernicker, Richard D. Carvajal, Omid Hamid, Laura Collins, Sarah Lockwood, Jaymin M. Patel, Jean-Francois Baurain, Piotr Rutkowski. Five-year survival with tebentafusp in previously untreated metastatic uveal melanoma in a phase 3 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT029.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-ct029
Primary Topic
Ocular Oncology and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract CT029: Five-year survival with tebentafusp in previously untreated metastatic uveal melanoma in a phase 3 trial

Josep M. Piulats, O Hamid, Paolo A. Ascierto, Sebastian Ochsenreither et al.
Cancer Research
Ocular Oncology and Treatments
article

Abstract CT029: Five-year survival with tebentafusp in previously untreated metastatic uveal melanoma in a phase 3 trial

Josep M. Piulats, O Hamid, Paolo A. Ascierto, Sebastian Ochsenreither, Marlana Orloff, Bartosz Chmielowski, Max Schlaak, R Dummer, Sarah Lockwood, Brendan Curti, Joseph J. Sacco, Richard D. Carvajal, Jaymin M. Patel, Ryan J. Sullivan, P Rutkowski, Marcus O. Butler, Lev Demidov, John M. Kirkwood, Paul Nathan, April KS Salama, Eric H. Bernicker, Jessica C. Hassel, Mohammed Milhem, Sophie Piperno-Neumann, Jean-Francois Baurain, Kari Kendra, Laura Collins, Lauris Gastaud, Anthony M. Joshua, Alexander N. Shoushtari
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) has a very poor prognosis with a historical survival rate of <10% at 5 yrs. Tebentafusp, a first in class ImmTAC bispecific (gp100 x CD3), is approved for adult HLA-A*02:01+ patients with unresectable or mUM based on a phase 3 study demonstrating improved overall survival (OS) compared to investigator’s choice (IC) (HR 0.51; IMCgp100-202; NCT03070392). This benefit was maintained at the 3-yr follow-up (HR 0.68), with a 3-yr OS rate of 27% for tebentafusp and 18% for IC. Molecular response assessed by ctDNA reduction was a better indicator of OS benefit than traditional RECISTv1.1 measurements. Here we report updated analyses of OS after a minimum follow-up of 5 yrs. Methods: In this randomized, open-label, Phase 3 trial, first line HLA-A*02:01+ mUM patients were randomized 2:1 to receive tebentafusp or IC of single-agent pembrolizumab, ipilimumab or dacarbazine, stratified by lactate dehydrogenase. Primary endpoint was OS. ctDNA reduction was an exploratory endpoint. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and treatment effects compared using Cox proportional hazards model. A Cox model, adjusted for baseline and time-varying covariates at progression, compared post-progression survival in tebentafusp patients with versus without treatment beyond radiographic progression (TBP). Results: 378 patients were randomized to tebentafusp (252) or IC (126; 82% pembrolizumab). With extended follow-up, the OS continued to favor tebentafusp, with a stratified hazard ratio of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.54-0.85). The 5-year OS rate for tebentafusp was 16% (95% CI, 11-21) vs 8% (95% CI, 4-14) for IC. The OS benefit was evident even in patients with known poor prognostic factors, including those with large tumors ≥ 10 cm. OS benefit was also seen in patients who did not have radiographic response including those with best response of progressive disease (PD) or those with a best change of tumor growth (>20%). Notably, in the tebentafusp arm, TBP was associated with better OS compared to no TBP, even after adjusting for covariates (HR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.44-0.83). In tebentafusp-treated patients, longer OS was associated with undetectable ctDNA at baseline or ctDNA reductions ≥50% by week 9. Among 21 ctDNA-evaluable patients who survived ≥ 5 years, 15 had undetectable baseline ctDNA and the remaining 6 had ctDNA clearance. Deep reductions in ctDNA were seen in patients regardless of baseline tumor burden and across all RECIST categories. Conclusions: Tebentafusp demonstrates durable, long-term OS benefit in first line HLA-A*02:01+ patients, which at 5 years is the longest OS follow-up in a randomized trial in mUM. OS benefit is evident in those with poor prognostic factors and remains independent of radiographic response, with ctDNA levels proving to be a better indicator of activity. This is the first report of long-term OS benefit in a solid tumor treated with an ImmTAC therapy. Citation Format: Paul Nathan, Sophie Piperno-Neumann, Jessica C. Hassel, Marcus O. Butler, Max Schlaak, Ryan J. Sullivan, Reinhard Dummer, John M. Kirkwood, Joseph J. Sacco, Alexander N. Shoushtari, Josep M. Piulats, April KS Salama, Marlana Orloff, Anthony M. Joshua, Sebastian Ochsenreither, Lauris Gastaud, Brendan Curti, Lev Demidov, Mohammed Milhem, Bartosz Chmielowski, Kari Kendra, Paolo Antonio Ascierto, Eric H. Bernicker, Richard D. Carvajal, Omid Hamid, Laura Collins, Sarah Lockwood, Jaymin M. Patel, Jean-Francois Baurain, Piotr Rutkowski. Five-year survival with tebentafusp in previously untreated metastatic uveal melanoma in a phase 3 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT029.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(8_Supplement)
Northwell Health (US), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Institut Català d'Ornitologia (ES), Duke University (US), Heidelberg University (DE), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), Providence Portland Medical Center (US), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (US), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US), Macclesfield College (GB), Portland VA Medical Center (US), Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Kettering University (US), St Vincent's Hospital Sydney (AU), Russian Cancer Research Center NN Blokhin (RU), Methodist Hospital (US), University Hospital of Zurich (CH), Immunocore (United Kingdom) (GB), Angeles Clinic and Research Institute (US), Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center (US), Institut Català d'Oncologia (ES), Mount Vernon Cancer Centre (GB), Methodist Hospital (US), National Center for Tumor Diseases (DE), USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), National Institute of Oncology (HU), Oregon Medical Research Center (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), Global Cancer Institute (US), National Medical Research Center of Cardiology (RU), The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (PL), Centre Antoine Lacassagne (FR), The Kinghorn Cancer Centre (AU), Amplimmune (United States) (US), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Ocular Oncology and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.