Co-designing solutions to promote awareness of cervical screening with women of low socio-economic position living in urban areas

Women of lower socio-economic position have a higher incidence of cervical cancer and less awareness and lower uptake of cervical screening in Ireland. Co-design is an approach applied in health research that works with healthcare professionals, patients and service-users to collaboratively develop solutions to a problem they face, valuing their expertise and knowledge. This research aimed to co-design appropriate solutions to promote cervical screening among women of low socio-economic position. Women aged 25–65, living in Dublin, who self-reported regular or irregular screening attendance, without university-level education and in low-income employment or not working, were recruited via community organisations. A pragmatic theory-informed co-design approach was employed using the Double Diamond design framework and behaviour change theory. Four co-design workshops were conducted to ideate solutions to overcome the barriers to screening participation and prototype solutions to promote screening using liberating structures, techniques and participatory activities. Subsequently, focus groups and interviews were conducted with other women of low socioeconomic position, healthcare providers, policymakers and community workers to assess their perceptions and acceptability of the co-designed solutions. The co-design group (N = 8) prioritised the following enablers and barriers to screening: visibility in the community; emotions of fear and anxiety; and support of friends and family. After ideating potential solutions, the top considerations were: supportive and accompanying friends/family; a national awareness day; education as early as possible. The co-design group prototyped two solutions: (1) a screening promotion tag placed alongside the price tag on underwear in clothes shops; and (2) a coffee morning in a local setting with a nurse to provide information on screening. Both solutions were perceived as acceptable to a range of stakeholders (N = 18) who suggested amendments to enhance the co-designed outputs. The co-designed solutions to develop campaigns to increase visibility in their community and normalise conversations about screening were acceptable. Community-led educational interventions and impactful marketing campaigns hold promise to increase awareness of screening. The study delineates genuine co-design research where women were decision-makers in developing relevant interventions to promote cervical screening in their community. This study provides a transparent, novel, theory-informed framework for co-designing health interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-27144-3
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-designing solutions to promote awareness of cervical screening with women of low socio-economic position living in urban areas

Andrew Darley, Thilo Kroll, Sophie Mulcahy Symmons, Aoife De Brún et al.
BMC Public Health
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Co-designing solutions to promote awareness of cervical screening with women of low socio-economic position living in urban areas

Andrew Darley, Thilo Kroll, Sophie Mulcahy Symmons, Aoife De Brún, Amanda Drury
article en

Abstract

Women of lower socio-economic position have a higher incidence of cervical cancer and less awareness and lower uptake of cervical screening in Ireland. Co-design is an approach applied in health research that works with healthcare professionals, patients and service-users to collaboratively develop solutions to a problem they face, valuing their expertise and knowledge. This research aimed to co-design appropriate solutions to promote cervical screening among women of low socio-economic position. Women aged 25–65, living in Dublin, who self-reported regular or irregular screening attendance, without university-level education and in low-income employment or not working, were recruited via community organisations. A pragmatic theory-informed co-design approach was employed using the Double Diamond design framework and behaviour change theory. Four co-design workshops were conducted to ideate solutions to overcome the barriers to screening participation and prototype solutions to promote screening using liberating structures, techniques and participatory activities. Subsequently, focus groups and interviews were conducted with other women of low socioeconomic position, healthcare providers, policymakers and community workers to assess their perceptions and acceptability of the co-designed solutions. The co-design group (N = 8) prioritised the following enablers and barriers to screening: visibility in the community; emotions of fear and anxiety; and support of friends and family. After ideating potential solutions, the top considerations were: supportive and accompanying friends/family; a national awareness day; education as early as possible. The co-design group prototyped two solutions: (1) a screening promotion tag placed alongside the price tag on underwear in clothes shops; and (2) a coffee morning in a local setting with a nurse to provide information on screening. Both solutions were perceived as acceptable to a range of stakeholders (N = 18) who suggested amendments to enhance the co-designed outputs. The co-designed solutions to develop campaigns to increase visibility in their community and normalise conversations about screening were acceptable. Community-led educational interventions and impactful marketing campaigns hold promise to increase awareness of screening. The study delineates genuine co-design research where women were decision-makers in developing relevant interventions to promote cervical screening in their community. This study provides a transparent, novel, theory-informed framework for co-designing health interventions.

BMC Public Health
University College Dublin (IE), Trinity College Dublin (IE), Dublin City University (IE)
Irish Cancer Society
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.