Dresden6—Current status and future of morphology-adaptive Eulerian modeling of multiphase flows

Multiphase flows are of great relevance to a wide range of industries, and their simulation using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is an important pillar for conducting design studies and gaining physical insight. However, a particular challenge in the simulation of multiphase flows is the occurrence of different morphologies or flow regimes, i.e. dispersed vs. segregated. The established simulation frameworks that have been developed over the years are usually only applicable to a specific morphology and level of detail. The simulation of a combination of morphologies is particularly challenging, and adaptive approaches are sought where the trade-off between level of detail and time to solution is mainly a matter of spatial resolution, rather than the fundamental choice of a method. In this respect, the Euler-Euler model has crucial properties that make it a good basis. This paper gives an overview of existing morphology-adaptive Eulerian methods, also often referred to as hybrid Eulerian methods. It is the result of a joint effort of the Dresden6 initiative, a loose association of research groups already active in this field. It gives an honest picture of current shortcomings and future development prospects. The aim of the work is to start a homogenization process by establishing a common terminology and listing suitable test cases that can be used for benchmarking, i.e. verification and validation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Computers & Fluids
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2026.107085
Primary Topic
Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dresden6—Current status and future of morphology-adaptive Eulerian modeling of multiphase flows

Richard Meller, Dirk Lucas, Susann Hänsch, Benjamin Krull et al.
Computers & Fluids
Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
article

Dresden6—Current status and future of morphology-adaptive Eulerian modeling of multiphase flows

Richard Meller, Dirk Lucas, Susann Hänsch, Benjamin Krull, Matej Tekavčič, Ronald Lehnigk, E.M.A. Frederix, Juho Peltola, Fabian Schlegel, Marco Colombo, V. Habiyaremye, Mohit P. Tandon, Thomas Höhne, Michele Cristina Pedroso, Amine Ben Hadj Ali
article en

Abstract

Multiphase flows are of great relevance to a wide range of industries, and their simulation using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is an important pillar for conducting design studies and gaining physical insight. However, a particular challenge in the simulation of multiphase flows is the occurrence of different morphologies or flow regimes, i.e. dispersed vs. segregated. The established simulation frameworks that have been developed over the years are usually only applicable to a specific morphology and level of detail. The simulation of a combination of morphologies is particularly challenging, and adaptive approaches are sought where the trade-off between level of detail and time to solution is mainly a matter of spatial resolution, rather than the fundamental choice of a method. In this respect, the Euler-Euler model has crucial properties that make it a good basis. This paper gives an overview of existing morphology-adaptive Eulerian methods, also often referred to as hybrid Eulerian methods. It is the result of a joint effort of the Dresden6 initiative, a loose association of research groups already active in this field. It gives an honest picture of current shortcomings and future development prospects. The aim of the work is to start a homogenization process by establishing a common terminology and listing suitable test cases that can be used for benchmarking, i.e. verification and validation.

Computers & FluidsVol. 314
Institut "Jožef Stefan", Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.