Abstract LB214: Evaluating a church-based navigation model to increase breast cancer screening uptake: Results from a cluster randomized trial

Abstract Background: Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States, yet screening rates are suboptimal among certain populations, particularly Korean Americans. Access-related barriers, language, and trust contribute to delayed diagnosis and persistent disparities in cancer outcomes. Faith-based organizations represent trusted, accessible settings for delivering health interventions. Through Community Outreach and Engagement (COE) partnerships, and guided by a community advisory sub-committee, we developed and adapted a culturally tailored intervention, Faith in Action!, which uses a train-the-trainer approach to prepare lay navigators and trusted church members to deliver the intervention and provide cancer education and screening navigation in faith-based settings. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of “Faith in Action!” on cancer screening adherence. Methods: A cluster randomized trial with staggered roll-out (NCT05298605) was conducted in 24 faith-based organizations randomized to either a faith-based breast cancer screening intervention or a wait-list control group. The intervention incorporated health education, community health advisor engagement, and facilitated access to cancer screening. Eligible participants were aged 45-75 years, attending participating Los Angeles County Korean churches, without a breast cancer diagnosis and not up to date with breast cancer screening at baseline. The primary outcome was guideline-concordant breast cancer screening within 6 months post-intervention. Secondary outcomes included intention to screen at 6 months and one yer, 1-year breast cancer screening adherence, and knowledge, assessed through standardized questionnaires. Results: A total of 235 women (median age 58 years) were enrolled across 3 cohorts of 8 churches (total 24 churches). Forty-five lay navigators were trained through the intervention. At 6-month follow-up, screening completion was higher in the intervention group compared with wait-list control (60.8% vs. 22.4%, p<0.0001). After adjustment for baseline characteristics and clustering, intervention group participants had statistically significant higher odds of receiving breast cancer screening compared to wait-list control (OR: 9.27, 95% CI 3.3-26.3). Significant improvements were also observed in intention to screen among intervention participants at 6 months (OR: 9.8, 95% CI 3.4-28.7). Retention was high, with 97% follow-up achieved at the primary 6-month time point among intervention participants. Conclusions: These findings suggest that Faith in Action! can increase breast cancer screening uptake among women who are not up to date on screening. Faith-based settings may offer a scalable, culturally acceptable cancer screening promotion strategy to reduce screening disparities among Korean women. Future research will evaluate the program’s long-term scalability, sustainability, and screening uptake in diverse faith settings and denominations and across other cancer types. Citation Format: Gillian Gresham, Zulfikarali Surani, Dong Hee Kim, Min Jung Sung, Marcio A. Diniz, Galen Cook-Wiens, Laurel Barosh, Michael Fine, Jane Fiegueiredo, Jeong Yup Lee, Alison K. Herrmann, Robert W. Haile. Evaluating a church-based navigation model to increase breast cancer screening uptake: Results from a cluster randomized trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr LB214.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-lb214
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract LB214: Evaluating a church-based navigation model to increase breast cancer screening uptake: Results from a cluster randomized trial

G. A. Gresham, Alison K. Herrmann, Zulfikarali Surani, Galen Cook‐Wiens et al.
Cancer Research
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Abstract LB214: Evaluating a church-based navigation model to increase breast cancer screening uptake: Results from a cluster randomized trial

G. A. Gresham, Alison K. Herrmann, Zulfikarali Surani, Galen Cook‐Wiens, Jeong Yup Lee, Min Jung Sung, Marcio A. Diniz, Michael Fine, Jane Fiegueiredo, Robert W. Haile, Dong Hee Kim, Laurel Barosh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States, yet screening rates are suboptimal among certain populations, particularly Korean Americans. Access-related barriers, language, and trust contribute to delayed diagnosis and persistent disparities in cancer outcomes. Faith-based organizations represent trusted, accessible settings for delivering health interventions. Through Community Outreach and Engagement (COE) partnerships, and guided by a community advisory sub-committee, we developed and adapted a culturally tailored intervention, Faith in Action!, which uses a train-the-trainer approach to prepare lay navigators and trusted church members to deliver the intervention and provide cancer education and screening navigation in faith-based settings. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of “Faith in Action!” on cancer screening adherence. Methods: A cluster randomized trial with staggered roll-out (NCT05298605) was conducted in 24 faith-based organizations randomized to either a faith-based breast cancer screening intervention or a wait-list control group. The intervention incorporated health education, community health advisor engagement, and facilitated access to cancer screening. Eligible participants were aged 45-75 years, attending participating Los Angeles County Korean churches, without a breast cancer diagnosis and not up to date with breast cancer screening at baseline. The primary outcome was guideline-concordant breast cancer screening within 6 months post-intervention. Secondary outcomes included intention to screen at 6 months and one yer, 1-year breast cancer screening adherence, and knowledge, assessed through standardized questionnaires. Results: A total of 235 women (median age 58 years) were enrolled across 3 cohorts of 8 churches (total 24 churches). Forty-five lay navigators were trained through the intervention. At 6-month follow-up, screening completion was higher in the intervention group compared with wait-list control (60.8% vs. 22.4%, p<0.0001). After adjustment for baseline characteristics and clustering, intervention group participants had statistically significant higher odds of receiving breast cancer screening compared to wait-list control (OR: 9.27, 95% CI 3.3-26.3). Significant improvements were also observed in intention to screen among intervention participants at 6 months (OR: 9.8, 95% CI 3.4-28.7). Retention was high, with 97% follow-up achieved at the primary 6-month time point among intervention participants. Conclusions: These findings suggest that Faith in Action! can increase breast cancer screening uptake among women who are not up to date on screening. Faith-based settings may offer a scalable, culturally acceptable cancer screening promotion strategy to reduce screening disparities among Korean women. Future research will evaluate the program’s long-term scalability, sustainability, and screening uptake in diverse faith settings and denominations and across other cancer types. Citation Format: Gillian Gresham, Zulfikarali Surani, Dong Hee Kim, Min Jung Sung, Marcio A. Diniz, Galen Cook-Wiens, Laurel Barosh, Michael Fine, Jane Fiegueiredo, Jeong Yup Lee, Alison K. Herrmann, Robert W. Haile. Evaluating a church-based navigation model to increase breast cancer screening uptake: Results from a cluster randomized trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr LB214.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(8_Supplement)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), APLA Health (US), Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.