Sustainability-Oriented Planning of Capacitor Banks for Loss Reduction and Voltage Improvement in Radial Distribution Feeders

Radial distribution feeders are especially sensitive to reactive-power deficits, which increase technical losses, deteriorate voltage profiles, reduce energy efficiency, and indirectly raise the emissions associated with the energy required to supply those losses. In this context, this paper proposes a sustainability-oriented planning methodology for the location and sizing of capacitor banks in radial distribution feeders, aimed at jointly improving technical performance, economic viability, and sustainability-related energy benefits. The problem is formulated as a discrete multi-objective model and solved through a constructive Greedy heuristic combined with backward/forward sweep load-flow evaluation, considering commercially available capacitor sizes. The methodology is validated on the IEEE 34-bus feeder, a demanding benchmark that remains less frequently used than the IEEE 33- and 69-bus systems in recent capacitor-planning studies. Seven scenarios are analyzed, from the uncompensated base case to configurations with up to six capacitor banks. The results show that all compensated scenarios improve feeder performance, reducing active losses from 25.3327 kW to a minimum of 20.1468 kW, equivalent to a maximum reduction of 20.47%, and increasing the minimum nodal voltage from 0.95528 p.u. to 0.97038 p.u. From a purely financial perspective, the one-bank scenario yields the highest net present value (USD 16,358.86), whereas the two-bank scenario emerges as the most balanced solution within the evaluated set, with annual savings of USD 5432.29 and a net present value of USD 11,497.58. Overall, the results confirm that capacitor-bank planning should be addressed as a trade-off among electrical efficiency, voltage support, profitability, and sustainability-oriented benefits. The proposed framework provides a simple, reproducible, and interpretable planning tool for radial distribution feeders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18084025
Primary Topic
Optimal Power Flow Distribution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainability-Oriented Planning of Capacitor Banks for Loss Reduction and Voltage Improvement in Radial Distribution Feeders

Jorge Muñoz-Pilco, Edwin Albuja-Calo
Sustainability
Optimal Power Flow Distribution
article

Sustainability-Oriented Planning of Capacitor Banks for Loss Reduction and Voltage Improvement in Radial Distribution Feeders

Jorge Muñoz-Pilco, Edwin Albuja-Calo
article en

Abstract

Radial distribution feeders are especially sensitive to reactive-power deficits, which increase technical losses, deteriorate voltage profiles, reduce energy efficiency, and indirectly raise the emissions associated with the energy required to supply those losses. In this context, this paper proposes a sustainability-oriented planning methodology for the location and sizing of capacitor banks in radial distribution feeders, aimed at jointly improving technical performance, economic viability, and sustainability-related energy benefits. The problem is formulated as a discrete multi-objective model and solved through a constructive Greedy heuristic combined with backward/forward sweep load-flow evaluation, considering commercially available capacitor sizes. The methodology is validated on the IEEE 34-bus feeder, a demanding benchmark that remains less frequently used than the IEEE 33- and 69-bus systems in recent capacitor-planning studies. Seven scenarios are analyzed, from the uncompensated base case to configurations with up to six capacitor banks. The results show that all compensated scenarios improve feeder performance, reducing active losses from 25.3327 kW to a minimum of 20.1468 kW, equivalent to a maximum reduction of 20.47%, and increasing the minimum nodal voltage from 0.95528 p.u. to 0.97038 p.u. From a purely financial perspective, the one-bank scenario yields the highest net present value (USD 16,358.86), whereas the two-bank scenario emerges as the most balanced solution within the evaluated set, with annual savings of USD 5432.29 and a net present value of USD 11,497.58. Overall, the results confirm that capacitor-bank planning should be addressed as a trade-off among electrical efficiency, voltage support, profitability, and sustainability-oriented benefits. The proposed framework provides a simple, reproducible, and interpretable planning tool for radial distribution feeders.

SustainabilityVol. 18(8)
National Polytechnic School (EC)
Universidad Politécnica Salesiana del Ecuador
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Optimal Power Flow Distribution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.